• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

酒精依赖与酒精饮料价格

Alcohol dependence and the price of alcoholic beverages.

作者信息

Farrell Susan, Manning Willard G, Finch Michael D

机构信息

University of Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2003 Jan;22(1):117-47. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00099-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00099-1
PMID:12564720
Abstract

This study estimates the impact of the price of alcoholic beverages on latent dimensions of current alcohol dependence and abuse. A three-part econometric model is used to estimate the impact of price on three latent dimensions (factors). For heavier drinking, the estimated price elasticity is -1.325 (P = 0.027); for physical and other consequences of drinking, -1.895 (P = 0.003); for increased salience of drinking, -0.411 (P = 0.339). For a single latent factor characterized simply as dependence/abuse, estimated price elasticity is -1.487 (P = 0.012). These results suggest that higher prices for alcohol reduce important dimensions of current alcohol dependence and abuse.

摘要

本研究估计了酒精饮料价格对当前酒精依赖和滥用潜在维度的影响。采用三部分计量经济模型来估计价格对三个潜在维度(因素)的影响。对于重度饮酒,估计的价格弹性为-1.325(P = 0.027);对于饮酒的身体及其他后果,为-1.895(P = 0.003);对于饮酒显著性增加,为-0.411(P = 0.339)。对于一个简单定义为依赖/滥用的单一潜在因素,估计的价格弹性为-1.487(P = 0.012)。这些结果表明,酒精价格上涨会降低当前酒精依赖和滥用的重要维度。

相似文献

1
Alcohol dependence and the price of alcoholic beverages.酒精依赖与酒精饮料价格
J Health Econ. 2003 Jan;22(1):117-47. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00099-1.
2
The effects of price on the consequences of alcohol use and abuse.价格对酒精使用及滥用后果的影响。
Recent Dev Alcohol. 1998;14:331-46. doi: 10.1007/0-306-47148-5_15.
3
The economics of alcohol abuse and alcohol-control policies.酒精滥用的经济学与酒精控制政策
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Mar-Apr;21(2):120-33. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.120.
4
Price elasticity of on- and off-premises demand for alcoholic drinks: A Tobit analysis.酒精饮料店内和店外需求的价格弹性:一项托比特分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Jun 1;163:222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.04.026. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
5
The demand for alcohol: the differential response to price.酒精需求:对价格的差异反应。
J Health Econ. 1995 Jun;14(2):123-48. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(94)00042-3.
6
Economic analysis aids alcohol research.经济分析有助于酒精研究。
Alcohol Res Health. 2000;24(1):62-71.
7
Price and income elasticities of demand for alcoholic beverages.酒精饮料需求的价格弹性和收入弹性。
Recent Dev Alcohol. 1983;1:303-45. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3617-4_18.
8
Is response to price equal for those with higher alcohol consumption?对于那些饮酒量较高的人,他们对价格的反应是否相同?
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Jan;17(1):23-9. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0651-z. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
9
What U.S. data should be used to measure the price elasticity of demand for alcohol?美国应该使用哪些数据来衡量酒精需求的价格弹性?
J Health Econ. 2012 Dec;31(6):851-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
10
Financial Armageddon.金融大灾难。
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2009 Mar;41(1):103. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2009.10400680.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between sexual victimization at age 14 and mental health and substance use outcomes at age 17.14岁时遭受性侵害与17岁时的心理健康及物质使用结果之间的关联。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 8. doi: 10.1007/s00787-025-02670-4.
2
Age of Onset and Its Related Factors in Cocaine or Methamphetamine Use in Adults from the United States: Results from NHANES 2005-2018.美国成年人可卡因或甲基苯丙胺使用的发病年龄及其相关因素:来自 NHANES 2005-2018 的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 22;18(22):12259. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212259.
3
Interested constituents: identifying groups to mobilize in community organizing efforts to strengthen alcohol control policies.
感兴趣的利益相关者:在社区组织努力中确定可以动员的群体,以加强酒精控制政策。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2021 May 4;47(3):393-401. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2020.1870690. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
4
Illicit drug use among students of a university in Southern Brazil.巴西南部一所大学学生中的非法药物使用情况。
Rev Saude Publica. 2020;54:57. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002176. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
5
Pathways connecting socioeconomic variables, substance abuse and gambling behaviour: a cross-sectional study on a sample of Italian high-school students.连接社会经济变量、物质滥用和赌博行为的途径:对意大利高中生样本的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 11;9(11):e031737. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031737.
6
An update on cannabis use disorder with comment on the impact of policy related to therapeutic and recreational cannabis use.大麻使用障碍的最新进展,并就与治疗和娱乐性大麻使用相关的政策影响发表评论。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019 Feb;269(1):73-86. doi: 10.1007/s00406-018-0976-1. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
7
Assessing the impact of alcohol taxation on rates of violent victimization in a large urban area: an agent-based modeling approach.评估酒类税收对一个大城市暴力受害率的影响:基于主体的建模方法。
Addiction. 2019 Feb;114(2):236-247. doi: 10.1111/add.14470. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
8
The potential impact of cannabis legalization on the development of cannabis use disorders.大麻合法化对大麻使用障碍发展的潜在影响。
Prev Med. 2017 Nov;104:31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.034. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
9
College-going and Trajectories of Drinking from Adolescence into Adulthood.从青少年到成年期的大学经历与饮酒轨迹
J Health Soc Behav. 2017 Jun;58(2):252-269. doi: 10.1177/0022146517693050. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
10
Minimum pricing of alcohol versus volumetric taxation: which policy will reduce heavy consumption without adversely affecting light and moderate consumers?酒精最低定价与按量征税:哪种政策能减少重度饮酒,同时又不对轻度和中度饮酒者产生不利影响?
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e80936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080936. eCollection 2014.