Suppr超能文献

酒精最低定价与按量征税:哪种政策能减少重度饮酒,同时又不对轻度和中度饮酒者产生不利影响?

Minimum pricing of alcohol versus volumetric taxation: which policy will reduce heavy consumption without adversely affecting light and moderate consumers?

作者信息

Sharma Anurag, Vandenberg Brian, Hollingsworth Bruce

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e80936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080936. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We estimate the effect on light, moderate and heavy consumers of alcohol from implementing a minimum unit price for alcohol (MUP) compared with a uniform volumetric tax.

METHODS

We analyse scanner data from a panel survey of demographically representative households (n = 885) collected over a one-year period (24 Jan 2010-22 Jan 2011) in the state of Victoria, Australia, which includes detailed records of each household's off-trade alcohol purchasing.

FINDINGS

The heaviest consumers (3% of the sample) currently purchase 20% of the total litres of alcohol (LALs), are more likely to purchase cask wine and full strength beer, and pay significantly less on average per standard drink compared to the lightest consumers (A$1.31 [95% CI 1.20-1.41] compared to $2.21 [95% CI 2.10-2.31]). Applying a MUP of A$1 per standard drink has a greater effect on reducing the mean annual volume of alcohol purchased by the heaviest consumers of wine (15.78 LALs [95% CI 14.86-16.69]) and beer (1.85 LALs [95% CI 1.64-2.05]) compared to a uniform volumetric tax (9.56 LALs [95% CI 9.10-10.01] and 0.49 LALs [95% CI 0.46-0.41], respectively). A MUP results in smaller increases in the annual cost for the heaviest consumers of wine ($393.60 [95% CI 374.19-413.00]) and beer ($108.26 [95% CI 94.76-121.75]), compared to a uniform volumetric tax ($552.46 [95% CI 530.55-574.36] and $163.92 [95% CI 152.79-175.03], respectively). Both a MUP and uniform volumetric tax have little effect on changing the annual cost of wine and beer for light and moderate consumers, and likewise little effect upon their purchasing.

CONCLUSIONS

While both a MUP and a uniform volumetric tax have potential to reduce heavy consumption of wine and beer without adversely affecting light and moderate consumers, a MUP offers the potential to achieve greater reductions in heavy consumption at a lower overall annual cost to consumers.

摘要

背景

我们评估了实施酒精最低单位价格(MUP)相较于统一体积税对轻度、中度和重度酒精消费者的影响。

方法

我们分析了来自澳大利亚维多利亚州一项为期一年(2010年1月24日至2011年1月22日)的具有人口统计学代表性家庭的面板调查(n = 885)的扫描数据,其中包括每个家庭非贸易酒精购买的详细记录。

结果

重度消费者(占样本的3%)目前购买了20%的酒精总量(LALs),更有可能购买桶装葡萄酒和原强度啤酒,与轻度消费者相比,平均每标准饮品支付的费用显著更低(分别为1.31澳元[95%置信区间1.20 - 1.41]和2.21澳元[95%置信区间2.10 - 2.31])。相较于统一体积税(葡萄酒为9.56 LALs[95%置信区间9.10 - 10.01],啤酒为0.49 LALs[95%置信区间0.46 - 0.41]),实施每标准饮品1澳元的最低单位价格对减少葡萄酒重度消费者(15.78 LALs[95%置信区间14.86 - 16.69])和啤酒重度消费者(1.85 LALs[95%置信区间1.64 - 2.05])的年平均酒精购买量有更大影响。与统一体积税(葡萄酒为552.46澳元[95%置信区间530.55 - 574.36],啤酒为163.92澳元[95%置信区间152.79 - 175.03])相比,最低单位价格导致葡萄酒重度消费者(393.60澳元[95%置信区间374.19 - 413.00])和啤酒重度消费者(108.26澳元[95%置信区间94.76 - 121.75])的年度成本增加幅度较小。最低单位价格和统一体积税对轻度和中度消费者的葡萄酒和啤酒年度成本变化影响都很小,对他们的购买行为影响同样很小。

结论

虽然最低单位价格和统一体积税都有可能减少葡萄酒和啤酒的重度消费,且不会对轻度和中度消费者产生不利影响,但最低单位价格有可能以更低的消费者总体年度成本实现更大幅度的重度消费减少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df68/3898955/0b91b2fa1bae/pone.0080936.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验