对于没有急性致命性创伤性脑损伤的创伤患者,现场气管插管并不能改善其预后。

Endotracheal intubation in the field does not improve outcome in trauma patients who present without an acutely lethal traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Bochicchio Grant V, Ilahi Obeid, Joshi Manjari, Bochicchio Kelly, Scalea Thomas M

机构信息

R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center and University of Maryland Medical School, Baltimore, 21201, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2003 Feb;54(2):307-11. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000046252.97590.BE.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There is an absence of prospective data evaluating the impact of prehospital intubation in adult trauma patients. Our objectives were to determine the outcome of trauma patients intubated in the field who did not have an acutely lethal traumatic brain injury (death within 48 hours) compared with patients who were intubated immediately on arrival to the hospital.

METHODS

Prospective data were collected on 191 consecutive patients admitted to the trauma center with a field Glasgow Coma Scale score < or = 8 and a head Abbreviated Injury Scale score > or = 3 who were either intubated in the field or intubated immediately at admission to the hospital. Patients who died within 48 hours of admission and transfers were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

Of the 191 patients, 176 (92%) sustained blunt trauma and 25 (8%) were victims of penetrating trauma. Seventy-eight (41%) of the 191 patients were intubated in the field and 113 (59%) were intubated immediately at admission. There was no significant difference in age, Glasgow Coma Scale score, head Abbreviated Injury Scale score, or Injury Severity Score between the two groups. Patients who were intubated in the field had a significantly higher morbidity (ventilator days, 14.7 vs. 10.4; hospital days, 20.2 vs. 16.7; and intensive care unit days, 15.2 vs. 11.7) compared with patients intubated on immediate arrival to the hospital and nearly double the mortality (23% vs. 12.4). Field-intubated patients had a 1.5 times greater risk of nosocomial pneumonia compared with hospital-intubated patients.

CONCLUSION

Prehospital intubation is associated with a significant increase in morbidity and mortality in trauma patients with traumatic brain injury who are admitted to the hospital without an acutely lethal injury. A randomized, prospective study is warranted to confirm these results.

摘要

目的

目前缺乏前瞻性数据来评估院前气管插管对成年创伤患者的影响。我们的目的是确定在现场进行气管插管且无急性致命性创伤性脑损伤(48小时内死亡)的创伤患者与入院后立即进行气管插管的患者的结局。

方法

前瞻性收集了191例连续入住创伤中心的患者的数据,这些患者格拉斯哥昏迷量表现场评分≤8分且头部简明损伤定级标准评分≥3分,他们要么在现场进行了气管插管,要么在入院时立即进行了气管插管。入院后48小时内死亡及转院的患者被排除在研究之外。

结果

191例患者中,176例(92%)为钝性创伤,25例(8%)为穿透性创伤受害者。191例患者中有78例(41%)在现场进行了气管插管,113例(59%)在入院时立即进行了气管插管。两组在年龄、格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分、头部简明损伤定级标准评分或损伤严重度评分方面无显著差异。与入院时立即进行气管插管的患者相比,在现场进行气管插管的患者发病率显著更高(机械通气天数:14.7天对10.4天;住院天数:20.2天对16.7天;重症监护病房天数:15.2天对11.7天),死亡率几乎翻倍(23%对12.4%)。与入院后气管插管的患者相比,现场气管插管的患者发生医院获得性肺炎的风险高1.5倍。

结论

对于无急性致命伤而入院的创伤性脑损伤创伤患者,院前气管插管与发病率和死亡率的显著增加相关。有必要进行一项随机前瞻性研究来证实这些结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索