Gutteridge Richard J, Bateman Geoffrey L, Todd Alan D
IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK.
Pest Manag Sci. 2003 Feb;59(2):215-24. doi: 10.1002/ps.574.
Relationships between take-all intensity and grain yield and quality were determined in field experiments on cereal crops using regression analyses, usually based on single-point disease assessments made during anthesis or grain-filling. Different amounts of take-all were achieved by different methods of applying inoculum artificially (to wheat only) or by using different cropping sequences (in wheat, triticale or barley) or sowing dates (wheat only) in crops with natural inoculum. Regressions of yield or thousand-grain weight on take-all intensity during grain filling were similar to those on accumulated disease (area under the disease progress curve) when these were compared in one of the wheat experiments. Regressions of yield on take-all intensity were more often significant in wheat than in the less susceptible crops, triticale and barley, even when a wide range of disease intensities was present in the latter crops. The regressions usually had most significance when there were plots in the severe disease category. Thousand-grain weight and hectolitre weight usually responded similarly to total grain yield. Decreased yield was often accompanied by a significant increase in the percentage of small grains. When severe take-all was present in wheat, regressions showed that nitrogen uptake was usually impaired. This was sometimes accompanied, however, by increased percentage nitrogen in the grain as a consequence of smaller grain size with decreased endosperm. Significant effects of take-all, both positive and negative, on Hagberg falling number in wheat sometimes occurred. Significant regressions of yield on take-all assessed earlier than usual, ie during booting rather than grain-filling in wheat and triticale and during anthesis/grain-filling rather than ripening in barley, had steeper slopes. This is consistent with observations that severe disease that develops early can be particularly damaging, whilst the crops, especially barley, can later express tolerance by producing additional, healthy roots. The regression parameters, including maximum potential yield (y-axis intercept) and the extrapolated maximum yield loss, also varied according to the different growing conditions, including experimental treatments and other husbandry operations. These differences must be considered when assessing the economic potential of a control measure such as fungicidal seed treatment.
通过回归分析,在谷类作物的田间试验中确定了全蚀病严重程度与谷物产量和品质之间的关系,回归分析通常基于在花期或灌浆期进行的单点病害评估。通过不同的人工接种方法(仅用于小麦)、或采用不同的种植顺序(小麦、小黑麦或大麦)、或在有自然接种源的作物中使用不同的播种日期(仅用于小麦),可实现不同程度的全蚀病。在一项小麦试验中比较时,灌浆期产量或千粒重与全蚀病严重程度的回归关系,与累积病害(病害进展曲线下的面积)的回归关系相似。产量与全蚀病严重程度的回归关系在小麦中比在较抗病的作物小黑麦和大麦中更常具有显著性,即使后两种作物中存在广泛的病害严重程度范围。当存在重病级别的小区时,回归关系通常最显著。千粒重和容重通常对总谷物产量有类似的响应。产量下降往往伴随着小粒百分比的显著增加。当小麦中存在严重的全蚀病时,回归分析表明氮素吸收通常会受到损害。然而,有时由于籽粒变小和胚乳减少,籽粒中的氮百分比会增加。全蚀病对小麦哈格伯格沉降值有时会产生显著的正负影响。在小麦和小黑麦中,在孕穗期而非灌浆期、在大麦中在花期/灌浆期而非成熟期评估全蚀病时,产量与全蚀病的显著回归关系具有更陡的斜率。这与以下观察结果一致:早期发生的严重病害可能特别具有破坏性,而作物,尤其是大麦,后来可以通过长出额外的健康根系来表现出耐受性。回归参数,包括最大潜在产量(y轴截距)和外推的最大产量损失,也因不同的生长条件而有所不同,包括实验处理和其他农事操作。在评估诸如种子杀菌剂处理等防治措施的经济潜力时,必须考虑这些差异。