Vandecasteele S J, Peetermans W E, R Merckx R, Rijnders B J A, Van Eldere J
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, University of Leuven, Belgium.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003 Feb;9(2):114-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00544.x.
To evaluate the usefulness of detecting two genes involved in biofilm formation (icaA and aap) and one gene involved in initial adhesion (atlE) for discrimination between contaminant, colonizing and invasive Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates involved in catheter-related infections.
The first group contained 29 isolates that were isolated from the skin of healthy volunteers (contaminant isolates). The second group contained 16 isolates recovered from catheters (>1000 CFUs on quantitative catheter culture) from asymptomatic patients without bacteremia. These isolates were considered to be colonizing isolates. The third group contained 34 isolates grown in >or=2 different blood cultures from patients with a systemic inflammatory response. These isolates were considered to be invasive isolates.
The prevalence of atlE did not differ between the three groups. The icaA and aap genes were significantly more prevalent in colonizing isolates (88% aap; 88% icaA) than in invasive isolates (68% aap, P = 0.179; 59% icaA, P = 0.055) and than in skin isolates (52% aap, P = 0.02; 38% icaA, P = 0.002).
The high prevalence of aap and icaA in skin isolates and their higher prevalence in colonizing than in invasive isolates led to a low specificity when these genes were used to differentiate between contamination, colonization and invasive infection. We conclude that, although the prevalence of these genes differs in the three groups, their presence cannot be used for clinical decision-making.
评估检测参与生物膜形成的两个基因(icaA和aap)以及参与初始黏附的一个基因(atlE),用于区分与导管相关感染中污染物、定植菌和侵袭性表皮葡萄球菌分离株的实用性。
第一组包含从健康志愿者皮肤分离出的29株分离株(污染物分离株)。第二组包含从无症状且无菌血症患者的导管中回收的16株分离株(定量导管培养>1000 CFU)。这些分离株被认为是定植分离株。第三组包含从患有全身炎症反应的患者的≥2种不同血培养物中培养出的34株分离株。这些分离株被认为是侵袭性分离株。
atlE在三组中的流行率无差异。icaA和aap基因在定植分离株中的流行率(88% aap;88% icaA)显著高于侵袭性分离株(68% aap,P = 0.179;59% icaA,P = 0.055)和皮肤分离株(52% aap,P = 0.02;38% icaA,P = 0.002)。
aap和icaA在皮肤分离株中的高流行率以及它们在定植分离株中的流行率高于侵袭性分离株,导致在使用这些基因区分污染、定植和侵袭性感染时特异性较低。我们得出结论,尽管这些基因在三组中的流行率不同,但它们的存在不能用于临床决策。