• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮肤病生活质量指数:图文版的影响

Dermatology Life Quality Index: influence of an illustrated version.

作者信息

Loo W J, Diba V, Chawla M, Finlay A Y

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Addenbrooke's NHS Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2003 Feb;148(2):279-84. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05158.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05158.x
PMID:12588380
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An illustrated version of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) was developed in order to improve the ease with which this standard questionnaire is answered.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the illustrated version with the text-only version of the DLQI.

METHODS

The two versions were administered to 206 patients attending Dermatology outpatient clinics. The time taken to complete either the illustrated or the text-only version was noted in 52 additional patients.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-one of 206 patients completed both questionnaires satisfactorily. Their mean DLQI scores were 6.4 (median 4.0, lower quartile 1.0, upper quartile 11.0) for the illustrated version and 6.3 (median 4.0, lower quartile 1.0, upper quartile 10.0) for the text-only version. For the 98 patients who answered the illustrated version first, the mean DLQI scores were 6.9 (median 4.0, lower quartile 1.9, upper quartile 11.9) for the illustrated version and 6.4 (median 4.0, lower quartile 1.8, upper quartile 11.0) for the text-only version. For the 93 patients who answered the text-only version first, the mean DLQI scores were 5.9 (median 4.0, lower quartile 1.7, upper quartile 10.2) for the illustrated version and 6.2 (median 5.0, lower quartile 0.5, upper quartile 9.5) for the text-only version. The median time taken to complete the text-only version was 124 s (mean +/- SD 126 +/- 65, n = 27) and 88 s (mean +/- SD 101 +/- 52, n = 25) for the illustrated version (P = 0.08). There was a very close correlation (r = 0.98) between the scores of the text-only and the illustrated versions; 82.2% of patients either scored the same or had a DLQI score difference of only 1. One hundred and seven (59.8%) patients preferred using the illustrated version and 66 (36.9%) preferred the text-only version. One hundred and four (57.5%) found the illustrated version easier to use.

CONCLUSIONS

The illustrated version was superior to the text-only version in terms of patient preference and ease of use, but it was not possible to demonstrate exact equivalence between the two versions.

摘要

背景

为了提高这份标准问卷的作答便捷性,开发了一份《皮肤病生活质量指数》(DLQI)的图示版本。

目的

比较DLQI的图示版本和纯文本版本。

方法

将这两个版本发放给206名皮肤科门诊患者。另外52名患者记录了完成图示版本或纯文本版本所需的时间。

结果

206名患者中有191名圆满完成了两份问卷。图示版本的平均DLQI得分为6.4(中位数4.0,下四分位数1.0,上四分位数11.0),纯文本版本为6.3(中位数4.0,下四分位数1.0,上四分位数10.0)。对于首先回答图示版本的98名患者,图示版本的平均DLQI得分为6.9(中位数4.0,下四分位数1.9,上四分位数11.9),纯文本版本为6.4(中位数4.0,下四分位数1.8,上四分位数11.0)。对于首先回答纯文本版本的93名患者,图示版本的平均DLQI得分为5.9(中位数4.0,下四分位数1.7,上四分位数10.2),纯文本版本为6.2(中位数5.0,下四分位数0.5,上四分位数9.5)。完成纯文本版本的中位数时间为124秒(均值±标准差126±65,n = 27),图示版本为88秒(均值±标准差101±52,n = 25)(P = 0.08)。纯文本版本和图示版本的得分之间存在非常紧密的相关性(r = 0.98);82.2%的患者得分相同或DLQI得分差异仅为1。107名(59.8%)患者更喜欢使用图示版本,66名(36.9%)更喜欢纯文本版本。104名(57.5%)患者认为图示版本更易于使用。

结论

在患者偏好和易用性方面,图示版本优于纯文本版本,但无法证明这两个版本完全等效。

相似文献

1
Dermatology Life Quality Index: influence of an illustrated version.皮肤病生活质量指数:图文版的影响
Br J Dermatol. 2003 Feb;148(2):279-84. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05158.x.
2
The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index: validation of the cartoon version.儿童皮肤病生活质量指数:卡通版的验证
Br J Dermatol. 2003 Feb;148(2):285-90. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05157.x.
3
Comparison of the paper-based and electronic versions of the Dermatology Life Quality Index: evidence of equivalence.皮肤病生活质量指数纸质版和电子版的比较:等效性证据。
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Nov;177(5):1306-1315. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15314. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
4
Comparison of the Dermatology Life Quality Index and the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index in assessment of quality of life in patients with psoriasis aged 16-17 years.比较皮肤病生活质量指数与儿童皮肤病生活质量指数在评估16 - 17岁银屑病患者生活质量中的作用。
Br J Dermatol. 2016 Jan;174(1):152-7. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14163. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
5
Validation study of Sinhala version of the dermatology life quality index (DLQI).僧伽罗语版皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)的验证研究。
Ceylon Med J. 2011 Mar;56(1):18-22. doi: 10.4038/cmj.v56i1.2890.
6
Cross validation of the Turkish version of dermatology life quality index.土耳其版皮肤病生活质量指数的交叉验证
Int J Dermatol. 2006 Nov;45(11):1300-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2006.02881.x.
7
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)--a simple practical measure for routine clinical use.皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)——一种用于日常临床的简单实用测量方法。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994 May;19(3):210-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1994.tb01167.x.
8
[Assessment on the reliability and validity of the Dermatology Life Quality Index in Chinese version].[中文版皮肤病生活质量指数的信效度评估]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2004 Sep;25(9):791-3.
9
Japanese version of the Dermatology Life Quality Index: validity and reliability in patients with acne.《皮肤病生活质量指数》日语版:痤疮患者的效度与信度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Aug 3;4:46. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-46.
10
Translating the science of quality of life into practice: What do dermatology life quality index scores mean?将生活质量科学转化为实践:皮肤病生活质量指数评分意味着什么?
J Invest Dermatol. 2005 Oct;125(4):659-64. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2005.23621.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Practical recommendations for the management of radiodermatitis: on behalf of the ESTRO RTT committee.放射性皮炎管理的实用建议:代表欧洲放射肿瘤学会放疗毒性反应委员会
Radiat Oncol. 2025 Mar 29;20(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13014-025-02624-9.
2
A Systematic Review of 207 Studies Describing Validation Aspects of the Dermatology Life Quality Index.《207 项描述皮肤病生活质量指数验证方面的研究的系统评价》
Acta Derm Venereol. 2024 Nov 7;104:adv41120. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v104.41120.
3
Clinical Goals and Barriers to Effective Psoriasis Care.银屑病有效护理的临床目标与障碍
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2019 Mar;9(1):5-18. doi: 10.1007/s13555-018-0279-5. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
4
The association of socioeconomic and clinical characteristics with health-related quality of life in patients with psoriasis: a cross-sectional study.社会经济和临床特征与银屑病患者健康相关生活质量的相关性:一项横断面研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Sep 12;16(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1007-7.
5
Favorable effects of explanatory illustrations attached to a self-administered questionnaire for upper extremity disorders.附加在上肢疾病自我管理问卷中的解释性插图的有利影响。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Jun;22(5):1145-9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0233-4. Epub 2012 Jul 22.
6
Measures of adult and juvenile dermatomyositis, polymyositis, and inclusion body myositis: Physician and Patient/Parent Global Activity, Manual Muscle Testing (MMT), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)/Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (C-HAQ), Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale (CMAS), Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT), Disease Activity Score (DAS), Short Form 36 (SF-36), Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ), physician global damage, Myositis Damage Index (MDI), Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT), Myositis Functional Index-2 (FI-2), Myositis Activities Profile (MAP), Inclusion Body Myositis Functional Rating Scale (IBMFRS), Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI), Cutaneous Assessment Tool (CAT), Dermatomyositis Skin Severity Index (DSSI), Skindex, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).成人及青少年皮肌炎、多发性肌炎和包涵体肌炎的评估指标:医生及患者/家长整体活动度、徒手肌力测试(MMT)、健康评估问卷(HAQ)/儿童健康评估问卷(C-HAQ)、儿童肌炎评估量表(CMAS)、肌炎疾病活动评估工具(MDAAT)、疾病活动评分(DAS)、简明健康状况调查问卷(SF-36)、儿童健康问卷(CHQ)、医生整体损伤程度、肌炎损伤指数(MDI)、定量肌肉测试(QMT)、肌炎功能指数-2(FI-2)、肌炎活动概况(MAP)、包涵体肌炎功能评定量表(IBMFRS)、皮肤型皮肌炎疾病面积和严重程度指数(CDASI)、皮肤评估工具(CAT)、皮肌炎皮肤严重程度指数(DSSI)、皮肤指数及皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11(0 11):S118-57. doi: 10.1002/acr.20532.