• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项促进步行和骑行的环境干预措施——悉尼西部新建铁路步道的影响

An environmental intervention to promote walking and cycling--the impact of a newly constructed Rail Trail in Western Sydney.

作者信息

Merom Dafna, Bauman Adrian, Vita Philip, Close Glenn

机构信息

Epidemiology Unit, NSW Centre for Physical Activity and Health, University of New South Wales, Liverpool NSW 2170, Australia.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2003 Feb;36(2):235-42. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00025-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00025-7
PMID:12590999
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have evaluated environmental changes to promote physical activity. The impact of a local promotional campaign around a newly constructed Rail Trail in western Sydney, Australia, was assessed.

METHODS

Pre and post-campaign telephone surveys were used. Adults 18-55 years of age were randomly sampled from an "inner" area, residents within < or =1.5 km of the Trail, and an "outer" area, bike-owners only, 1.5-5 km from the Trail. Objective concurrent monitoring of daily bike counts was carried out.

RESULTS

A cohort of 450 completed both interviews. A significant increase (+2.9%, McNemar P < 0.05) in unprompted Trail awareness was detected but post-campaign awareness was low (34%). Inner cyclists, males, and those recalling any baseline bike promotion messages were more likely to be aware of the Trail. Trail usage was higher among bike-owners than pedestrians (8.9 vs 3.3%, P = 0.014) and was moderated by proximity to the Trail. Inner cyclists increased mean cycling time by 0.19 h (SD = 1.5) while outer cyclists decreased cycling time (-0.24 h, SD = 1.6). Mean daily bike counts in the monitored areas increased significantly after the Trail launch (OR = 1.35, P = 0.0001, and OR = 1.23, P = 0.0004).

CONCLUSIONS

The campaign reached and influenced cyclists in the inner area. For further increase in Trail usage promotional and educational programs focusing on walking for inner residents are needed.

摘要

背景

很少有研究评估促进身体活动的环境变化。本研究评估了澳大利亚悉尼西部一条新建铁路步道周边开展的地方宣传活动的影响。

方法

采用活动前后的电话调查。从“内”区域(距离步道≤1.5公里的居民)和“外”区域(仅自行车所有者,距离步道1.5 - 5公里)随机抽取18 - 55岁的成年人。同时对每日自行车通行量进行客观监测。

结果

450名参与者完成了两次访谈。发现自发的步道知晓率有显著提高(+2.9%,McNemar检验P < 0.05),但活动后的知晓率较低(34%)。在内区域的骑行者、男性以及那些回忆起任何基线自行车推广信息的人更有可能知晓这条步道。自行车所有者的步道使用率高于行人(8.9%对3.3%,P = 0.014),且受与步道距离的影响。内区域的骑行者平均骑行时间增加了0.19小时(标准差 = 1.5),而外区域的骑行者骑行时间减少了(-0.24小时,标准差 = 1.6)。步道开放后,监测区域的每日自行车通行量显著增加(比值比 = 1.35,P = 0.0001,以及比值比 = 1.23,P = 0.0004)。

结论

该活动覆盖并影响了内区域的骑行者。为进一步提高步道使用率,需要针对内区域居民开展侧重于步行的推广和教育项目。

相似文献

1
An environmental intervention to promote walking and cycling--the impact of a newly constructed Rail Trail in Western Sydney.一项促进步行和骑行的环境干预措施——悉尼西部新建铁路步道的影响
Prev Med. 2003 Feb;36(2):235-42. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00025-7.
2
Use of and short-term impacts of new cycling infrastructure in inner-Sydney, Australia: a quasi-experimental design.澳大利亚悉尼市中心新自行车道设施的使用情况及其短期影响:一项准实验设计
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Oct 6;12:129. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0294-1.
3
Evaluating change in physical activity with the building of a multi-use trail.通过建设多用途步道评估身体活动的变化。
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Feb;28(2 Suppl 2):177-85. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.020.
4
Worksite and communications-based promotion of a local walking path.基于工作场所和通信手段对当地一条步行道进行推广。
J Community Health. 2006 Aug;31(4):326-42. doi: 10.1007/s10900-006-9013-9.
5
Using a bicycle-pedestrian count to assess active living in downtown Wilkes-Barre.使用自行车-行人计数评估威尔克斯-巴里市中心的积极生活。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Nov;43(5 Suppl 4):S399-402. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.06.029.
6
Safety in numbers in Australia: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling.澳大利亚的人多即安全:步行者和骑自行车的人越多,步行和骑自行车就越安全。
Health Promot J Austr. 2005 Apr;16(1):47-51. doi: 10.1071/he05047.
7
Happy trails: the effect of a media campaign on urban trail use in southern Nevada.愉快之旅:一项媒体宣传活动对内华达州南部城市步道使用情况的影响
J Phys Act Health. 2015 Jan;12(1):48-51. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2013-0218. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
8
The effect of a trail use intervention on urban trail use in Southern Nevada.一项试行使用干预措施对南内华达州城市步道使用情况的影响。
Prev Med. 2014 Oct;67 Suppl 1:S17-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.04.027. Epub 2014 May 16.
9
Effect of bike lane infrastructure improvements on ridership in one New Orleans neighborhood.自行车道基础设施改善对新奥尔良一个社区骑行率的影响。
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Feb;45 Suppl 1:S101-7. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9440-z.
10
Closing the loop: short term impacts on physical activity of the completion of a loop trail in Sydney, Australia.闭环:澳大利亚悉尼完成环路步道对身体活动的短期影响。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Jul 15;16(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0815-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Results from the ENJOY MAP for HEALTH: a quasi experiment evaluating the impact of age-friendly outdoor exercise equipment to increase older people's park visitations and physical activity.健康促进友好户外环境地图研究结果:一项准实验评估了友好型户外运动器材对增加老年人公园使用和身体活动的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 22;24(1):1663. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19042-3.
2
Virtual reality assessment of walking in a modifiable urban environment: a feasibility and acceptability study.虚拟现实评估可修改城市环境中的行走:一项可行性和可接受性研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 11;13(1):5867. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32139-w.
3
Bikeability and the induced demand for cycling.
骑行能力与自行车出行的诱增需求。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Apr 18;120(16):e2220515120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220515120. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
4
Identification of Effective Programs to Improve Access to and Use of Trails among Youth from Under-Resourced Communities: A Review.识别有效项目以改善资源匮乏社区青年对步道的使用和利用:综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 22;17(21):7707. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217707.
5
Comparing the Trail Users with Trail Non-Users on Physical Activity, Sleep, Mood and Well-Being Index.比较步道使用者和步道非使用者在身体活动、睡眠、情绪和幸福指数方面的差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 27;17(17):6225. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176225.
6
Association between trail use and self-rated wellness and health.步道使用与自我评估的健康和健康之间的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 30;20(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8273-0.
7
A systematic review of the effect of infrastructural interventions to promote cycling: strengthening causal inference from observational data.基础设施干预措施促进自行车出行效果的系统评价:从观察数据中加强因果推断。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Oct 26;16(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0850-1.
8
Use of Geographic Information Systems in Physical Activity Interventions: a Systematic Review.地理信息系统在身体活动干预中的应用:一项系统综述。
Prog Prev Med (N Y). 2019 Jun 14;4(2):e0022. doi: 10.1097/pp9.0000000000000022. eCollection 2019 Jun.
9
A longitudinal study examining uptake of new recreation infrastructure by inactive adults.一项纵向研究考察了不活跃成年人对新娱乐基础设施的采用情况。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Aug 1;16(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0823-4.
10
Closing the loop: short term impacts on physical activity of the completion of a loop trail in Sydney, Australia.闭环:澳大利亚悉尼完成环路步道对身体活动的短期影响。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Jul 15;16(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0815-4.