• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骑行能力与自行车出行的诱增需求。

Bikeability and the induced demand for cycling.

机构信息

Centre for Computational Economics, Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark.

Department of Technology, Management and Economics, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Apr 18;120(16):e2220515120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220515120. Epub 2023 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2220515120
PMID:37040413
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10120086/
Abstract

To what extent is the volume of urban bicycle traffic affected by the provision of bicycle infrastructure? In this study, we exploit a large dataset of GPS trajectories of bicycle trips in combination with a fine-grained representation of the Copenhagen bicycle-relevant network. We apply a model for bicyclists' choice of route from origin to destination that takes the complete network into account. This enables us to determine bicyclists' preferences for a range of infrastructure and land-use types. We use the estimated preferences to compute a generalized cost of bicycle travel, which we correlate with the number of bicycle trips across a large number of origin-destination pairs. Simulations suggest that the extensive Copenhagen bicycle lane network has caused the number of bicycle trips and the bicycle kilometers traveled to increase by 60% and 90%, respectively, compared with a counterfactual without the bicycle lane network. This translates into an annual benefit of €0.4M per km of bicycle lane owing to changes in generalized travel cost, health, and accidents. Our results thus strongly support the provision of bicycle infrastructure.

摘要

城市自行车交通量在多大程度上受到自行车基础设施的影响?在这项研究中,我们利用了一个大型的自行车出行 GPS 轨迹数据集,并结合哥本哈根自行车相关网络的细粒度表示,应用了一种考虑完整网络的自行车出行者路径选择模型。这使我们能够确定自行车出行者对一系列基础设施和土地利用类型的偏好。我们使用估计的偏好来计算自行车出行的广义成本,并将其与大量起点-终点对的自行车出行次数进行相关分析。模拟结果表明,广泛的哥本哈根自行车道网络使自行车出行次数和自行车行驶里程分别增加了 60%和 90%,与没有自行车道网络的情况相比。这相当于由于广义出行成本、健康和事故的变化,每公里自行车道带来 0.4 万欧元的年度效益。因此,我们的研究结果强烈支持自行车基础设施的建设。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71df/10120086/82aeade7b239/pnas.2220515120fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71df/10120086/a87d80614d47/pnas.2220515120fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71df/10120086/a9caedf36c21/pnas.2220515120fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71df/10120086/60e5195e9f3d/pnas.2220515120fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71df/10120086/82aeade7b239/pnas.2220515120fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71df/10120086/a87d80614d47/pnas.2220515120fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71df/10120086/a9caedf36c21/pnas.2220515120fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71df/10120086/60e5195e9f3d/pnas.2220515120fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71df/10120086/82aeade7b239/pnas.2220515120fig04.jpg

相似文献

1
Bikeability and the induced demand for cycling.骑行能力与自行车出行的诱增需求。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Apr 18;120(16):e2220515120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220515120. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
2
Evaluating the effectiveness of on-street bicycle lane and assessing risk to bicyclists in Charlotte, North Carolina.评估北卡罗来纳州夏洛特市的街道自行车道有效性并评估对骑自行车者的风险。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Mar;76:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.12.020. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
3
Urban Cycling Expansion is Associated with an Increased Number of Clavicle Fractures.城市自行车骑行的扩张与锁骨骨折数量的增加有关。
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2020 Jun;78(2):101-107.
4
Demand-driven design of bicycle infrastructure networks for improved urban bikeability.需求驱动的自行车基础设施网络设计,以提高城市自行车出行便利性。
Nat Comput Sci. 2022 Oct;2(10):655-664. doi: 10.1038/s43588-022-00318-w. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
5
Role of exposure in bicycle safety analysis: Effect of cycle path choice.暴露在自行车安全分析中的作用:自行车道选择的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Apr;153:106014. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106014. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
6
The unintended impact of helmet use on bicyclists' risk-taking behaviors.头盔使用对自行车骑行者冒险行为的意外影响。
J Safety Res. 2021 Dec;79:135-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.08.014. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
7
Roles of infrastructure and land use in bicycle crash exposure and frequency: A case study using Greater London bike sharing data.基础设施和土地利用在自行车碰撞暴露和频率中的作用:使用大伦敦自行车共享数据的案例研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Sep;144:105652. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105652. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
8
Studying bicyclists' perceived level of safety using a bicycle simulator combined with immersive virtual reality.使用自行车模拟器和沉浸式虚拟现实技术研究自行车骑行者的感知安全水平。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;151:105943. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105943. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
9
Comparison of US metropolitan region pedestrian and bicyclist fatality rates.美国大都市区行人与骑自行车者死亡率的比较。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Sep;106:82-98. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.018. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
10
Road crash fatality rates in France: a comparison of road user types, taking account of travel practices.法国道路交通事故死亡率:考虑出行方式的道路使用者类型比较
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Feb;75:217-25. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.10.025. Epub 2014 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Robust design of bicycle infrastructure networks.自行车基础设施网络的稳健设计。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 3;15(1):15471. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99976-9.
2
Cohesive urban bicycle infrastructure design through optimal transport routing in multilayer networks.通过多层网络中的最优交通路线实现紧凑的城市自行车基础设施设计。
J R Soc Interface. 2025 Feb;22(223):20240532. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0532. Epub 2025 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Provisional COVID-19 infrastructure induces large, rapid increases in cycling.临时的新冠疫情基础设施促使骑行量大幅、迅速增加。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2024399118.
2
Built Environment Interventions to Increase Active Travel: a Critical Review and Discussion.构建环境干预措施以增加积极出行:批判性回顾与讨论。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2019 Dec;6(4):309-315. doi: 10.1007/s40572-019-00254-4.
3
A systematic review of the effect of infrastructural interventions to promote cycling: strengthening causal inference from observational data.
基础设施干预措施促进自行车出行效果的系统评价:从观察数据中加强因果推断。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Oct 26;16(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0850-1.
4
New walking and cycling routes and increased physical activity: one- and 2-year findings from the UK iConnect Study.新的步行和骑行路线以及增加的身体活动:英国 iConnect 研究的 1 年和 2 年结果。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Sep;104(9):e38-46. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302059. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
5
Health benefits of cycling: a systematic review.骑自行车的健康益处:系统评价。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011 Aug;21(4):496-509. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01299.x. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
6
Do the health benefits of cycling outweigh the risks?骑自行车的健康益处是否超过了风险?
Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Aug;118(8):1109-16. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901747. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
7
Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review.促进自行车出行的基础设施、项目和政策:国际综述。
Prev Med. 2010 Jan;50 Suppl 1:S106-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.028. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
8
Evaluating change in physical activity with the building of a multi-use trail.通过建设多用途步道评估身体活动的变化。
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Feb;28(2 Suppl 2):177-85. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.020.
9
An environmental intervention to promote walking and cycling--the impact of a newly constructed Rail Trail in Western Sydney.一项促进步行和骑行的环境干预措施——悉尼西部新建铁路步道的影响
Prev Med. 2003 Feb;36(2):235-42. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00025-7.