Cornefjord M, Henriques T, Alemany M, Olerud C
Department of Orthopaedics, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
Eur Spine J. 2003 Feb;12(1):91-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-002-0470-2. Epub 2002 Oct 26.
In posterior C1-C2 fusion, traditional wire fixation gives poor stability. The bone quality is often insufficient to provide the competent structural bone graft that is required, and the introduction of sublaminar wires is somewhat dangerous. The stability is markedly improved by adding transarticular screws, but the drawbacks of structural bone graft and sublaminar wires remain. The C1 claw of the Olerud Cervical Fixation System improves C1-C2 fixation without relying on structural bone graft or compromising the spinal canal. The aim of this study was to evaluate radiological healing and possible complications in a consecutive series of C1-C2 fusions from our department operated with the C1 claw device. Twenty-six patients (14 women) with a mean age of 73 (range 37-93) years were included. The diagnoses were odontoid fracture in 18 patients, rheumatoid instability in 6, and odontoid non-union and os odontoideum in 1 each. The patients were followed clinically and with plain radiographs for an average of 15 (range 3-27) months. There were no neurological or vascular complications, and no secondary displacements or reoperations in the series. Twenty patients followed for 6-27 months were radiographically healed. Six patients died from unrelated causes 1-38 months postoperatively. Three of these patients had no radiographs later than the postoperative control, one had a healed odontoid fracture but resorbed bone graft at 8 months, while the remaining two patients were not healed, but showed no signs of healing disturbance at the time of death. On the basis of the findings of this study, posterior C1-C2 fusion with the Olerud Cervical Fixation System seems promising. No serious complications related to the surgical procedure were encountered. The stability of the implant obviates the use of a solid bone block as a graft and still allows a high frequency of fusion healing.
在C1-C2后路融合术中,传统的钢丝固定稳定性较差。骨质通常不足以提供所需的合适结构性骨移植,且引入椎板下钢丝存在一定危险性。通过增加经关节螺钉可显著提高稳定性,但结构性骨移植和椎板下钢丝的缺点依然存在。Olerud颈椎固定系统的C1爪形装置可改善C1-C2固定,无需依赖结构性骨移植且不影响椎管。本研究的目的是评估在我们科室使用C1爪形装置进行的一系列连续C1-C2融合术中的影像学愈合情况及可能的并发症。纳入了26例患者(14例女性),平均年龄73岁(范围37-93岁)。诊断为齿状突骨折18例,类风湿性不稳6例,齿状突不愈合和齿突骨各1例。对患者进行了平均15个月(范围3-27个月)的临床及X线平片随访。该系列中无神经或血管并发症,无二次移位或再次手术情况。20例随访6-27个月的患者影像学显示愈合。6例患者术后1-38个月因无关原因死亡。其中3例患者术后未进行过比对照更晚的X线检查,1例患者齿状突骨折愈合但8个月时骨移植吸收,其余2例患者未愈合,但死亡时无愈合障碍迹象。基于本研究结果,使用Olerud颈椎固定系统进行C1-C2后路融合术似乎前景良好。未遇到与手术操作相关的严重并发症。植入物的稳定性避免了使用实体骨块作为移植,且仍能实现较高的融合愈合率。