Coyne T J, Fehlings M G, Wallace M C, Bernstein M, Tator C H
Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Neurosurgery. 1995 Oct;37(4):688-92; discussion 692-3. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199510000-00012.
Posterior wiring techniques are the most commonly used methods of achieving C1-C2 arthrodesis. Recently, transarticular screw fixation and interlaminar clamping have been advocated to achieve more secure fixation. A retrospective review of patients undergoing C1-C2 fusion for nonneoplastic disease was undertaken at the University of Toronto Hospital, with the aim of determining the long-term outcome of the selected procedures. Thirty-two patients underwent 36 procedures from 1986 to 1992, with a mean follow-up of 4.7 +/- 2.2 years (range, 2.0-8.0 yr). The most common disease processes were odontoid fracture (18 patients), transverse atlantal ligament injury (5 patients), os odontoideum (5 patients), and rheumatoid C1-C2 instability (3 patients). Thirty-one Gallie fusions, one Brooks-Jenkins fusion, two transarticular screw fusions, and two Halifax clamp applications were performed. Six (19%) of Gallie/Brooks-Jenkins fusions failed. These occurred with os odontoideum (three patients), Type II odontoid fracture (two patients), and transverse atlantal ligament injury (one patient). All transarticular screw and Halifax clamp procedures resulted in successful fusions. Two procedures (6%) resulted in new neurological deficit; both of these patients underwent posterior wiring for os odontoideum. This study suggests that Type II odontoid fractures may be successfully managed by a posterior wiring technique alone. Rheumatoid C1-C2 instability may be managed by posterior wiring supplemented with halo immobilization. Transarticular screw fixation has several potential advantages as a technique for C1-C2 arthrodesis and, in particular, may be appropriate for os odontoideum that had a high failure rate (75%) with conventional posterior wiring, even when this was supplemented with halo bracing.
后路固定技术是实现C1-C2关节融合最常用的方法。近来,经关节螺钉固定和椎板间夹钳固定被提倡用于获得更可靠的固定。在多伦多大学医院对因非肿瘤性疾病接受C1-C2融合术的患者进行了一项回顾性研究,目的是确定所选手术的长期疗效。1986年至1992年期间,32例患者接受了36次手术,平均随访时间为4.7±2.2年(范围2.0 - 8.0年)。最常见的疾病过程为齿状突骨折(18例患者)、寰椎横韧带损伤(5例患者)、齿突骨(5例患者)和类风湿性C1-C2不稳定(3例患者)。进行了31次Gallie融合术、1次Brooks-Jenkins融合术、2次经关节螺钉融合术和2次Halifax夹钳应用。6例(19%)Gallie/Brooks-Jenkins融合失败。这些失败发生在齿突骨(3例患者)、II型齿状突骨折(2例患者)和寰椎横韧带损伤(1例患者)。所有经关节螺钉和Halifax夹钳手术均成功融合。2例手术(6%)导致新的神经功能缺损;这2例患者均因齿突骨接受了后路固定。本研究表明,II型齿状突骨折单独采用后路固定技术可能成功治疗。类风湿性C1-C2不稳定可采用后路固定并辅以头环固定治疗。经关节螺钉固定作为一种C1-C2关节融合技术有几个潜在优势,特别是对于传统后路固定失败率高(75%)的齿突骨,即使辅以头环支撑时也是如此。