Suppr超能文献

丙酸氟替卡松与布地奈德经雾化器给药的比较:一项针对重度持续性哮喘患者的随机对照试验。

Comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide administered via nebulizer: a randomized controlled trial in patients with severe persistent asthma.

作者信息

Lin Jiangtao, Chen Ping, Liu Chuntao, Kang Jian, Xiao Wei, Chen Zhengxian, Tang Huaping, Du Xin, Liu Cindy, Luo Linda

机构信息

China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.

General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region, Shenyang 110000, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2017 Feb;9(2):372-385. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.02.51.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study compared the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) inhalation n solution with budesonide (BUD) suspension for inhalation administered via nebulizer, in Chinese adult patients with severe, persistent asthma.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, randomized, active-controlled, single-blind, parallel-group study, conducted at 26 clinical sites in China. Participants were randomized 1:1 to FP nebules 1 mg twice daily or BUD 2 mg twice daily via nebulizer for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 317 adult patients were randomized. The primary endpoint was mean change in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) over weeks 1-12 from baseline, and analyzed in the ITT (n=315) and PP populations (n=283). Week 12 PEF increase from baseline was 26.7 L/min (14.1%) and 28.0 L/min (15.3%) in the ITT population, and 29.1 L/min (15.7%) and 30.1 L/min (16.2%) in the PP population, in the FP and BUD groups, respectively; all improvements were of clinical significance. Lower limits of the two-sided 95% CIs for the least squares (LS) mean treatment difference (FP minus BUD) were -12.19 L/min (ITT) and -12.95 L/min (PP), both above the pre-specified non-inferiority criteria -12.00 L/min and not clinically meaningful. There was no significant difference in the week 12 mean FEV increase between the FP and BUD groups (0.237 L/16.79% . 0.236 L/17.73%). Lower limits of the 95% CIs for LS mean treatment difference in morning PEF change from baseline over weeks 1-4 in a analysis were -10.41 and -11.96 L/min in the ITT and PP populations respectively; both above -12.00 L/min. A review of safety data indicated that rates of AEs, SAEs, and drug-related AEs were similar between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The 12-week treatment of FP inhalation solution administered via nebulizer is safe and effectively for treating severe, persistent asthma in Chinese patients over 12 week.

摘要

背景

本研究比较了丙酸氟替卡松(FP)吸入溶液与布地奈德(BUD)混悬液经雾化器吸入给药,对中国成年重度持续性哮喘患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

这是一项在中国26个临床地点进行的多中心、随机、活性对照、单盲、平行组研究。参与者按1:1随机分为每日两次雾化吸入1 mg FP雾化液或每日两次雾化吸入2 mg BUD,为期12周。

结果

共有317例成年患者被随机分组。主要终点是第1 - 12周早晨呼气峰流速(PEF)相对于基线的平均变化,并在意向性分析(ITT,n = 315)和符合方案人群(PP,n = 283)中进行分析。在ITT人群中,第12周时,FP组和BUD组相对于基线的PEF增加分别为26.7 L/min(14.1%)和28.0 L/min(15.3%);在PP人群中,分别为29.1 L/min(15.7%)和30.1 L/min(16.2%);所有改善均具有临床意义。最小二乘(LS)均值治疗差异(FP减去BUD)的双侧95%置信区间下限在ITT人群中为-12.19 L/min,在PP人群中为-12.95 L/min,均高于预先设定的非劣效性标准-12.00 L/min,且无临床意义。FP组和BUD组在第12周时平均第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV)增加无显著差异(0.237 L/16.79%对0.236 L/17.73%)。在ITT和PP人群中,1 - 4周早晨PEF相对于基线变化的LS均值治疗差异的95%置信区间下限分别为-10.41和-11.96 L/min;均高于-12.00 L/min。安全性数据回顾表明,两组之间不良事件(AE)、严重不良事件(SAE)和药物相关AE的发生率相似。

结论

经雾化器吸入FP溶液治疗12周对中国患者治疗重度持续性哮喘安全有效。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验