Fraser Douglas G W, Moody Alan R, Davidson Ian R, Martel Anne L, Morgan Paul S
Department of Academic Radiology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, England.
Radiology. 2003 Mar;226(3):812-20. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2263012205. Epub 2003 Jan 24.
To assess diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability at venous enhanced subtracted peak arterial (VESPA) magnetic resonance (MR) venography compared with those at conventional venography for the diagnosis of femoral and iliac deep venous thrombosis (DVT).
A single anteroposterior maximum intensity projection (MIP) venogram of the femoral and iliac veins was constructed by using VESPA MR venography in 55 symptomatic patients suspected of having lower limb DVT. All patients also underwent conventional venography, results of which were used as the standard of reference. VESPA MR venograms were interpreted by two independent reviewers (reviewers A and B) who were unaware of other results. Sensitivity and specificity of VESPA MR venography for the diagnosis of thrombus in the femoral and iliac veins were calculated. Interobserver variability was calculated for these observations by using weighted kappa with equally spaced weights for positive, nondiagnostic, and negative studies. Nondiagnostic studies were reinterpreted separately by reviewer A on the basis of source data.
Sensitivity of VESPA MR venography for the femoral veins (20 of 20) and iliac veins (seven of seven) was 100% for both reviewers. Specificity was 100% (39 of 39 for reviewer A, 40 of 40 for reviewer B) for the iliac veins and 97% (31 of 32) for the femoral veins for both reviewers. Segments in which the VESPA MR venograms were nondiagnostic were excluded from this analysis. Interobserver variability as calculated by using weighted kappa for positive, negative, and nondiagnostic studies was 0.85 for femoral veins and 0.97 for iliac veins. Interpretation of the source data led to correct diagnosis in six of six cases in which the VESPA MR venograms were nondiagnostic.
VESPA MR venography yielded MIP venograms that were highly accurate for the diagnosis of DVT in femoral and iliac veins. Interpretation of the studies was also highly reproducible.
评估静脉增强减影峰值动脉期(VESPA)磁共振(MR)静脉造影与传统静脉造影在诊断股静脉和髂静脉深静脉血栓形成(DVT)方面的诊断准确性及观察者间的变异性。
对55例疑似下肢DVT的有症状患者,采用VESPA MR静脉造影构建股静脉和髂静脉的单幅前后位最大强度投影(MIP)静脉造影图像。所有患者均接受传统静脉造影,其结果用作参考标准。VESPA MR静脉造影图像由两名独立的阅片者(阅片者A和B)解读,他们对其他结果不知情。计算VESPA MR静脉造影对股静脉和髂静脉血栓诊断的敏感性和特异性。通过使用加权kappa值计算这些观察结果的观察者间变异性,对阳性、非诊断性和阴性研究采用等间距权重。非诊断性研究由阅片者A根据原始数据单独重新解读。
两位阅片者对股静脉(20例中的20例)和髂静脉(7例中的7例)的VESPA MR静脉造影敏感性均为100%。两位阅片者对髂静脉的特异性均为100%(阅片者A为39例中的39例,阅片者B为40例中的40例),对股静脉的特异性均为97%(32例中的31例)。本分析排除了VESPA MR静脉造影为非诊断性的节段。使用加权kappa值计算的阳性、阴性和非诊断性研究的观察者间变异性,股静脉为0.85,髂静脉为0.97。对原始数据的解读使6例VESPA MR静脉造影为非诊断性的病例中的6例得到了正确诊断。
VESPA MR静脉造影生成的MIP静脉造影图像对股静脉和髂静脉DVT的诊断具有高度准确性。研究解读的可重复性也很高。