Suppr超能文献

[德国精神科日间医院当前的结构和程序质量指标]

[Current structural and procedural quality markers of psychiatric day hospitals in Germany].

作者信息

Kallert Thomas W, Schützwohl Matthias, Matthes Christiane

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden.

出版信息

Psychiatr Prax. 2003 Mar;30(2):72-82. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-37442.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Particularly in the last 10 years the conceptual models of partial hospitalization are subjected to major changes, reflecting to the integration of day hospitals in regional mental health service systems and especially to the provision of an alternative to acute inpatient treatment. Systematic nation-wide surveys assessing these changes are missing.

METHOD

After developing a structured questionnaire integrating differences in European mental health care systems, a German national survey of current structural and procedural quality markers of psychiatric day hospitals was carried out in 2001. 51.4 % of the addressed psychiatric hospitals (N = 191) returned the questionnaire. Analysis is based on descriptive and correlational methods, compares the situation in the Eastern and Western German Federal States, and uses cluster analysis to differentiate the day hospitals according to their main program function.

RESULTS

In general, establishment of day hospitals in Germany has not yet reached the evidence-based capacity level. This statement especially applies to the situation in rural areas. 56 % of the day hospitals currently assess themselves as an alternative to inpatient treatment simultaneously providing differentiated psychotherapeutic treatment. Comparing clinical institutions in the Eastern and Western parts of Germany demonstrates the clearer orientation towards acute psychiatric treatment in the recently (mostly after 1995) established East-German hospitals. This is reflected in the spectrum of main clinical diagnoses, in the average length of treatment episodes, in the definitions of contraindications, and in the provided diagnostic measures. While administrative circumstances are homogeneous for day hospitals, there is a considerable variation in staff numbers related to the core professions.

CONCLUSIONS

Guidelines for professional training and continuous qualification as well as staffing have to be modified according to requirements resulting from the change of clinical functions. Each day hospital has to clarify and define its main program function(s), and has to better communicate the consequences for the regional mental health service system.

摘要

背景

尤其是在过去十年中,部分住院治疗的概念模式发生了重大变化,这反映了日间医院融入区域精神卫生服务体系,特别是为急性住院治疗提供了一种替代方案。目前尚缺乏评估这些变化的全国性系统调查。

方法

在制定了一份整合欧洲精神卫生保健系统差异的结构化问卷后,2001年在德国开展了一项关于精神病日间医院当前结构和程序质量指标的全国性调查。191家被调查的精神病医院中有51.4%返回了问卷。分析基于描述性和相关性方法,比较了德国东部和西部联邦州的情况,并使用聚类分析根据日间医院的主要项目功能对其进行区分。

结果

总体而言,德国日间医院的设立尚未达到循证能力水平。这一说法尤其适用于农村地区的情况。目前,56%的日间医院将自己评估为住院治疗的替代方案,同时提供差异化的心理治疗。比较德国东部和西部的临床机构可以发现,东德近期(大多在1995年之后)设立的医院对急性精神病治疗的定位更为明确。这体现在主要临床诊断范围、治疗疗程的平均长度、禁忌症的定义以及所提供的诊断措施中。虽然日间医院的行政情况较为统一,但与核心专业相关的工作人员数量存在相当大的差异。

结论

专业培训、持续资质认证以及人员配备的指导方针必须根据临床功能变化产生的要求进行调整。每家日间医院都必须明确并界定其主要项目功能,并更好地传达其对区域精神卫生服务体系的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验