Suppr超能文献

论疾病、病患和患病这三者。

On the triad disease, illness and sickness.

作者信息

Hofmann Bjørn

机构信息

Center of Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 2002 Dec;27(6):651-73. doi: 10.1076/jmep.27.6.651.13793.

Abstract

The point of departure for this article is a review of the discussion between Twaddle and Nordenfelt on the concepts of disease, illness, and sickness, and the objective is to investigate the fruitfulness of these concepts. It is argued that disease, illness, and sickness represent different perspectives on human ailment and that they can be applied to analyze both epistemic and normative challenges to modern medicine. In particular the analysis reveals epistemic and normative differences between the concepts. Furthermore, the article demonstrates, against Nordenfelt's claim, that the concepts of disease, illness, and sickness can exist without a general theory of health. Additionally, the complexity of different perspectives on human ailment also explains why it is so difficult to give strict definitions of basic concepts within modern health care.

摘要

本文的出发点是回顾特瓦德尔与诺德费尔特之间关于疾病、病患和患病概念的讨论,目的是探究这些概念的成效。有人认为,疾病、病患和患病代表了对人类疾病的不同视角,并且它们可用于分析现代医学面临的认知和规范挑战。具体而言,分析揭示了这些概念在认知和规范方面的差异。此外,本文与诺德费尔特的观点相反,证明了疾病、病患和患病的概念可以在没有一般健康理论的情况下存在。另外,对人类疾病不同视角的复杂性也解释了为何难以对现代医疗保健中的基本概念给出严格定义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验