Fernandopulle Rohini B M, Weerasuriya Krisantha
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Drug Saf. 2003;26(4):219-25. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200326040-00002.
The current system of pharmacovigilance encourages reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) mainly from healthcare professionals. Underreporting is a major problem, more so in the developing world than in the developed world. Less than 3% of reports added to the WHO database in the year 2000 originated from developing countries, although around 80% of the global population lives in the developing world [corrected]. Also a considerable time lag still exists in recognition of serious ADRs. Hence, there is a need for a different approach to pharmacovigilance. We present an overview of possible reasons for underreporting by healthcare professionals with particular emphasis on the developing world, and the potential benefits of encouraging consumer reporting. Only a few countries accept consumer reports. We suggest an independent consumer reporting system for hypothesis generation to complement the present health professional-based system. We also highlight the low priority given by multinational pharmaceutical companies to the developing countries regarding new safety information. The important questions are whether the resources available would be sufficiently robust to sustain such a system in the developing world, and whether it will be sufficiently robust and sensitive for the early detection of signals.
当前的药物警戒系统主要鼓励医疗保健专业人员报告药品不良反应(ADR)。漏报是一个主要问题,在发展中世界比在发达世界更为严重。2000年添加到世界卫生组织数据库中的报告不到3%来自发展中国家,尽管全球约80%的人口生活在发展中世界[已修正]。在识别严重药品不良反应方面也仍然存在相当长的时间滞后。因此,需要一种不同的药物警戒方法。我们概述了医疗保健专业人员漏报的可能原因,特别强调了发展中世界,并阐述了鼓励消费者报告的潜在益处。只有少数国家接受消费者报告。我们建议建立一个独立的消费者报告系统用于生成假设,以补充当前基于卫生专业人员的系统。我们还强调了跨国制药公司在新安全信息方面对发展中国家的低关注度。重要的问题是,现有资源是否足以在发展中世界维持这样一个系统,以及它对于早期信号检测是否足够强大和灵敏。