Sciurba Frank, Criner Gerard J, Lee Shing M, Mohsenifar Zab, Shade David, Slivka William, Wise Robert A
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5501 Hopkins Bayview Circle, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Jun 1;167(11):1522-7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200203-166OC. Epub 2003 Feb 20.
The 6-minute walk test is used in clinical practice and clinical trials of lung diseases; however, it is not clear whether replicate tests need to be performed to assess performance. Furthermore, little is known about the impact of walking course layout on test performance. We conducted 6-minute walks on 761 patients with severe emphysema (mean +/- SD FEV1% predicted = 26.3 +/- 7.2) who were participants in the National Emphysema Treatment Trial. Four hundred seventy participants had repeated walks on a separate day. The second test was improved by an average of 7.0 +/- 15.2% (66.1 +/- 146 feet, p < 0.0001, by paired t test), with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.88 between days. The course layout had an effect on the distance walked. Participants tested on continuous (circular or oval) courses had a 92.2-foot longer walking distance than those tested on straight (out and back) courses. Course length had no significant effect on walking distance. The training effect found in these patients with severe emphysema is less than in previous reports of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Furthermore, the layout of the track may influence the 6-minute walk performance.
6分钟步行试验用于肺部疾病的临床实践和临床试验;然而,尚不清楚是否需要进行重复测试来评估性能。此外,关于步行路线布局对测试性能的影响知之甚少。我们对761名重度肺气肿患者(预测的平均±标准差FEV1% = 26.3±7.2)进行了6分钟步行测试,这些患者均参与了国家肺气肿治疗试验。470名参与者在另一天进行了重复步行测试。第二次测试平均提高了7.0±15.2%(66.1±146英尺,配对t检验,p < 0.0001),两天之间的组内相关系数为0.88。路线布局对步行距离有影响。在连续(圆形或椭圆形)路线上进行测试的参与者比在直线(往返)路线上进行测试的参与者步行距离长92.2英尺。路线长度对步行距离没有显著影响。在这些重度肺气肿患者中发现的训练效果低于先前关于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的报告。此外,路线布局可能会影响6分钟步行测试的表现。