Israel L
Gerontology. 1976;22(3):157-84. doi: 10.1159/000212132.
Two series of mnesic tests were elaborated for experimental purposes by grouping and adapting traditional memory tests. The first set gives an overall study of the individual by assessing his short-term retention abilities. The second set is more specific and measures essentially his learning capabilities and the memorizing processes. These test series were designed to furnish both an instantaneous evaluation of the individual in relation to a group and a longitudinal evaluation of his abilities. Rather than assessing the mnesic capital, the test series evaluate the dynamic forms of memory expression which underlie every mnemonic operation, such as: memory span (or field of apprehension), retention processes, recognition, identification, spontaneous reminiscence, induced reminiscence (or associative memory), learning abilities on the basis of both concrete and practical as well as abstract and verbal material. They represent a psychometric tool permitting comparisons through a range of retests and quantifiable scoring of results. But they are also a clinical instrument, in the sense that the processes of the various intellectual functions can be qualitatively apprehended.
为了实验目的,通过对传统记忆测试进行分组和改编,精心设计了两组记忆测试。第一组通过评估个体的短期记忆能力,对其进行全面研究。第二组则更具针对性,主要测量其学习能力和记忆过程。这些测试组旨在提供个体相对于群体的即时评估以及其能力的纵向评估。测试组并非评估记忆资本,而是评估构成每个记忆操作基础的记忆表达的动态形式,例如:记忆广度(或理解范围)、记忆过程、识别、辨认、自发回忆、诱发回忆(或联想记忆)、基于具体和实际以及抽象和语言材料的学习能力。它们是一种心理测量工具,允许通过一系列重新测试进行比较并对结果进行可量化评分。但从某种意义上说,它们也是一种临床工具,因为可以定性地理解各种智力功能的过程。