• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Modelling the cost effectiveness of interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in the management of multiple sclerosis. Commentary: evaluating disease modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症治疗中β-干扰素和醋酸格拉替雷成本效益的模型构建。评论:评估多发性硬化症的疾病修正治疗
BMJ. 2003 Mar 8;326(7388):522; discussion 522. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7388.522.
2
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in the UK Multiple Sclerosis Risk Sharing Scheme at 6 years: a clinical cohort study with natural history comparator.英国多发性硬化症风险分担计划中干扰素β和格拉替雷醋酸 6 年的疗效和成本效益:具有自然史对照的临床队列研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2015 May;14(5):497-505. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00018-6. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
3
Cost-effectiveness of four immunomodulatory therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a Markov model based on long-term clinical data.四种免疫调节疗法用于复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益:基于长期临床数据的马尔可夫模型
J Manag Care Pharm. 2007 Apr;13(3):245-61. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.3.245.
4
Comparing the cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying drugs for the first-line treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.比较疾病修饰药物用于复发缓解型多发性硬化症一线治疗的成本效益。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Sep;15(7):543-55. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.7.543.
5
Effects of cohort selection on the results of cost-effectiveness analysis of disease-modifying drugs for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.队列选择对复发缓解型多发性硬化症疾病修饰药物成本效益分析结果的影响。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Jun;17(5):377-81. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.5.377.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of peginterferon beta-1a compared with interferon beta-1a and glatiramer acetate in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the United States.在美国,用聚乙二醇干扰素β-1a 与干扰素β-1a 和那他珠单抗治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2016 Jul;19(7):684-95. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2016.1157080. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
7
Cost-effectiveness analyses of natalizumab (Tysabri) compared with other disease-modifying therapies for people with highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the UK.在英国,将那他珠单抗(泰萨比)与其他改善病情疗法用于高度活动性复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的成本效益分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(7):617-27. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826070-00008.
8
Health outcomes in multiple sclerosis.
Curr Opin Neurol. 2004 Jun;17(3):257-61. doi: 10.1097/00019052-200406000-00004.
9
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.用于多发性硬化症的免疫调节剂和免疫抑制剂:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 6;2013(6):CD008933. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008933.pub2.
10
The cost of multiple sclerosis and the cost effectiveness of disease-modifying agents in its treatment.多发性硬化症的治疗成本及疾病修正药物治疗的成本效益
CNS Drugs. 2004;18(9):561-74. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200418090-00002.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of ofatumumab for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis in the United Arab Emirates.奥法木单抗治疗阿联酋复发型多发性硬化症的成本效益
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2025 Apr 28;18:17562864251330260. doi: 10.1177/17562864251330260. eCollection 2025.
2
Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analysis of disease-modifying drugs of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.复发缓解型多发性硬化症疾病修正药物的成本效用和成本效益分析:一项系统评价
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Feb 16;14(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00478-7.
3
Cost-effectiveness of cladribine tablets and dimethyl fumarate in the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in Spain.在西班牙,克拉屈滨片和富马酸二甲酯治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2023 Feb;12(2):e220193. doi: 10.2217/cer-2022-0193. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
4
How have Economic Evaluations in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Evolved Over Time? A Systematic Literature Review.复发型多发性硬化症的经济学评估如何随时间演变?一项系统文献综述。
Neurol Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):557-583. doi: 10.1007/s40120-021-00264-1. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
5
Exploring the Cost Effectiveness of Shared Decision Making for Choosing between Disease-Modifying Drugs for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the Netherlands: A State Transition Model.探索在荷兰对缓解复发型多发性硬化症的疾病修正药物进行选择时共享决策制定的成本效益:状态转移模型。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Nov;40(8):1003-1019. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20961091.
6
Informing Medication Discontinuation Decisions among Older Adults with Relapsing-Onset Multiple Sclerosis.告知复发缓解型多发性硬化症老年患者停药决策。
Drugs Aging. 2020 Mar;37(3):225-235. doi: 10.1007/s40266-019-00741-1.
7
Glatiramer acetate as a clinically and cost-effective treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis over 10 years of use within the National Health Service: Final results from the UK Risk Sharing Scheme.醋酸格拉替雷在英国国家医疗服务体系中使用超过10年,作为复发型多发性硬化症的临床及性价比高的治疗方法:英国风险分担计划的最终结果
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2019 Dec 5;5(4):2055217319893103. doi: 10.1177/2055217319893103. eCollection 2019 Oct-Dec.
8
Cost-effectiveness of Teriflunomide Compared to Interferon Beta-1b for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Patients in China.在中国,与干扰素β-1b 相比,特立氟胺治疗复发型多发性硬化症的成本效果分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2019 Mar;39(3):331-340. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00750-3.
9
Assessing the long-term effectiveness of interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis: final 10-year results from the UK multiple sclerosis risk-sharing scheme.评估干扰素-β和醋酸格拉替雷在多发性硬化症中的长期疗效:来自英国多发性硬化症风险分担计划的最终 10 年结果。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;90(3):251-260. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-318360. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
10
Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Cost-Utility Analysis.复发缓解型和原发进展型多发性硬化症的疾病修正治疗:成本效用分析。
CNS Drugs. 2018 Dec;32(12):1145-1157. doi: 10.1007/s40263-018-0566-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Competing interests in multiple sclerosis research.
Lancet. 2003 Jan 25;361(9354):350-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12354-9.
2
A review of the natural history and epidemiology of multiple sclerosis: implications for resource allocation and health economic models.多发性硬化症的自然史与流行病学综述:对资源分配和健康经济模型的影响
Health Technol Assess. 2002;6(10):1-73. doi: 10.3310/hta6100.
3
Interferon in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.干扰素在复发缓解型多发性硬化症中的应用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;2001(4):CD002002. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002002.
4
Cost-effectiveness of interferon beta-1b in slowing multiple sclerosis disability progression. First estimates.干扰素β-1b延缓多发性硬化症残疾进展的成本效益。初步估算。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000 Summer;16(3):751-67. doi: 10.1017/s026646230010203x.
5
Long-term treatment of multiple sclerosis with interferon-beta may be cost effective.使用β-干扰素对多发性硬化症进行长期治疗可能具有成本效益。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Jul;18(1):45-53. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200018010-00005.
6
Population based cost utility study of interferon beta-1b in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.基于人群的干扰素β-1b治疗继发进展型多发性硬化症的成本效用研究。
BMJ. 1999 Dec 11;319(7224):1529-33. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7224.1529.
7
Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study of interferon beta-1a in relapsing/remitting multiple sclerosis. PRISMS (Prevention of Relapses and Disability by Interferon beta-1a Subcutaneously in Multiple Sclerosis) Study Group.皮下注射干扰素β-1a预防复发型/缓解型多发性硬化症复发和残疾的随机双盲安慰剂对照研究。PRISMS(皮下注射干扰素β-1a预防多发性硬化症复发和残疾)研究组。
Lancet. 1998 Nov 7;352(9139):1498-504.
8
Placebo-controlled multicentre randomised trial of interferon beta-1b in treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. European Study Group on interferon beta-1b in secondary progressive MS.干扰素β-1b治疗继发进展型多发性硬化症的安慰剂对照多中心随机试验。继发进展型多发性硬化症干扰素β-1b欧洲研究组
Lancet. 1998 Nov 7;352(9139):1491-7.
9
A cost-utility analysis of interferon beta for multiple sclerosis.
Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(4):iii-54.
10
Intramuscular interferon beta-1a for disease progression in relapsing multiple sclerosis. The Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group (MSCRG).肌肉注射干扰素β-1a治疗复发型多发性硬化症的疾病进展。多发性硬化症协作研究组(MSCRG)。
Ann Neurol. 1996 Mar;39(3):285-94. doi: 10.1002/ana.410390304.

多发性硬化症治疗中β-干扰素和醋酸格拉替雷成本效益的模型构建。评论:评估多发性硬化症的疾病修正治疗

Modelling the cost effectiveness of interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in the management of multiple sclerosis. Commentary: evaluating disease modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis.

作者信息

Chilcott Jim, McCabe Chris, Tappenden Paul, O'Hagan Anthony, Cooper Nicola J, Abrams Keith, Claxton Karl, Miller David H

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research Rapid Reviews Group, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield.

出版信息

BMJ. 2003 Mar 8;326(7388):522; discussion 522. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7388.522.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.326.7388.522
PMID:12623909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC150460/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost effectiveness of four disease modifying treatments (interferon betas and glatiramer acetate) for relapsing remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom.

DESIGN

Modelling cost effectiveness.

SETTING

UK NHS.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cost per quality adjusted life year gained.

RESULTS

The base case cost per quality adjusted life year gained by using any of the four treatments ranged from pound 42,000 (66,469 dollars; 61,630 euro) to pound 98,000 based on efficacy information in the public domain. Uncertainty analysis suggests that the probability of any of these treatments having a cost effectiveness better than pound 20,000 at 20 years is below 20%. The key determinants of cost effectiveness were the time horizon, the progression of patients after stopping treatment, differential discount rates, and the price of the treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Cost effectiveness varied markedly between the interventions. Uncertainty around point estimates was substantial. This uncertainty could be reduced by conducting research on the true magnitude of the effect of these drugs, the progression of patients after stopping treatment, the costs of care, and the quality of life of the patients. Price was the key modifiable determinant of the cost effectiveness of these treatments.

摘要

目的

评估四种疾病修正治疗方法(β-干扰素和醋酸格拉替雷)对英国复发缓解型和继发进展型多发性硬化症的成本效益。

设计

成本效益建模。

背景

英国国民医疗服务体系。

参与者

复发缓解型多发性硬化症和继发进展型多发性硬化症患者。

主要观察指标

每获得一个质量调整生命年的成本。

结果

根据公开领域的疗效信息,使用这四种治疗方法中的任何一种每获得一个质量调整生命年的基础成本从42,000英镑(66,469美元;61,630欧元)到98,000英镑不等。不确定性分析表明,在20年时,这些治疗方法中任何一种的成本效益优于20,000英镑的概率低于20%。成本效益的关键决定因素是时间范围、停止治疗后患者的病情进展、不同的贴现率以及治疗价格。

结论

不同干预措施的成本效益差异显著。点估计值周围的不确定性很大。通过对这些药物的实际疗效大小、停止治疗后患者的病情进展、护理成本以及患者的生活质量进行研究,可以降低这种不确定性。价格是这些治疗方法成本效益的关键可调整决定因素。