Suppr超能文献

双胞胎作为研究轻度语言发育迟缓病因的自然实验:I:设计;双胞胎与单胎在语言及产科风险方面的差异

Twins as a natural experiment to study the causes of mild language delay: I: Design; twin-singleton differences in language, and obstetric risks.

作者信息

Rutter Michael, Thorpe Karen, Greenwood Rosemary, Northstone Kate, Golding Jean

机构信息

Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Research Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK.

出版信息

J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003 Mar;44(3):326-41. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00125.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Twins tend to lag behind singletons in their language development, but the causes were unknown. The possibilities suggested include obstetric complications, twin-specific features, and postnatal differences in family interaction. The present study was designed to pit these alternatives against one another as possible causal influences.

METHOD

The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) was used to identify the 116 twin pairs (of whom 96 participated) and 114 pairs of singletons (of whom 98 participated) whose ages were no more than 30 months apart. The McArthur Communicative Development Inventory was completed at 20 months, and the Pre-School Language Scales (PLS-3), and the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities at 36 months. Obstetric and perinatal complications were assessed on the basis of detailed systematic parental reports, together with a systematic coded abstraction of all medical records dealing with pregnancy and the neonatal period. Family background details were assessed from parental reports, and the primary carer's verbal functioning was assessed by the Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale. Congenital anomalies were assessed using the method of Waldrop and Halverson.

RESULTS

The language of twins was 1.7 months below that of singletons at 20 months and 3.1 months at 3 years. The verbal cognitive score of twins was about half a standard deviation lower than that of singletons. The twin-singleton differences in language level were found tobe unassociated with obstetric/perinatal features as assessed from both parental reports and medical records, to birthweight or gestation, to birthweight discrepancy within the twin pair, or to congenital anomalies.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that obstetric/perinatal features do not account for the slower language development in twins as compared with singletons, within a sample born after at least 33 weeks gestation.

摘要

背景

双胞胎在语言发展方面往往落后于单胞胎,但原因尚不清楚。提出的可能性包括产科并发症、双胞胎特有的特征以及家庭互动中的产后差异。本研究旨在将这些因素作为可能的因果影响相互比较。

方法

利用埃文亲子纵向研究(ALSPAC)确定年龄相差不超过30个月的116对双胞胎(其中96对参与)和114对单胞胎(其中98对参与)。在20个月时完成麦克阿瑟沟通发展量表,在36个月时完成学前语言量表(PLS - 3)和麦卡锡儿童能力量表。根据详细的系统家长报告以及对所有涉及妊娠和新生儿期的医疗记录进行系统编码摘要,评估产科和围产期并发症。从家长报告中评估家庭背景细节,并通过米尔希尔词汇量表评估主要照顾者的语言功能。使用沃尔德罗普和哈尔弗森的方法评估先天性异常。

结果

双胞胎在20个月时的语言水平比单胞胎低1.7个月,在3岁时低3.1个月。双胞胎的语言认知得分比单胞胎低约半个标准差。发现双胞胎与单胞胎在语言水平上的差异与根据家长报告和医疗记录评估的产科/围产期特征、出生体重或孕周、双胞胎对之间的出生体重差异或先天性异常无关。

结论

得出的结论是,在至少妊娠33周后出生的样本中,产科/围产期特征并不能解释双胞胎与单胞胎相比语言发展较慢的现象。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验