Fahey Tom, Montgomery Alan A, Barnes James, Protheroe Jo
Tayside Centre for General Practice, University of Dundee, Dundee DD2 4AD.
BMJ. 2003 Mar 15;326(7389):580. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7389.580.
To assess the quality of care given to elderly people and compare the care given to residents in nursing homes with those living in their own homes.
Controlled observational study.
Primary care, Bristol.
Elderly individuals (aged > or =65 years) registered with three general practices, of whom 172 were residents in nursing homes (cases) and 526 lived at home (matched controls).
The quality of clinical care given to patients was measured against explicit standards. Quality indicators were derived from national sources and agreed with participating general practitioners.
The overall standard of care was inadequate when judged against the quality indicators, irrespective of where patients lived. The overall prescribing of beneficial drugs for some conditions was deficient--for example, only 38% (11/29) (95% confidence interval 20% to 58%) of patients were prescribed beta blockers after myocardial infarction. The proportion of patients with heart disease or diabetes who had had their blood pressure measured in the past two years (heart disease) or past year (diabetes) was lower among those living in nursing homes: for heart disease, 74% (17/23) v 96% (122/127) (adjusted odds ratio 0.18, 0.04 to 0.75); for diabetes, 62% (8/13) v 96% (50/52) (adjusted odds ratio 0.05, 0.01 to 0.38). In terms of potentially harmful prescribing, significantly more patients in nursing homes were prescribed neuroleptic medication (28% (49/172) v 11% (56/526) (3.82, 2.37 to 6.17)) and laxatives (39% (67/172) v 16% (85/526) (2.79, 1.79 to 4.36)). Nursing home residents were less likely to have the appropriate diagnostic Read code linked to their prescribed neuroleptic drug (0.22, 0.07 to 0.71).
The quality of medical care that elderly patients receive in one UK city, particularly those in nursing homes, is inadequate. We suggest that better coordinated care for these patients would avoid the problems of overuse of unnecessary or harmful drugs, underuse of beneficial drugs, and poor monitoring of chronic disease.
评估给予老年人的护理质量,并比较养老院居民与居家老人所接受的护理。
对照观察性研究。
布里斯托尔的初级医疗保健机构。
在三家全科诊所注册的老年人(年龄≥65岁),其中172人为养老院居民(病例组),526人为居家老人(匹配对照组)。
根据明确标准衡量给予患者的临床护理质量。质量指标源自国家资料来源,并经参与研究的全科医生认可。
根据质量指标判断,无论患者居住何处,总体护理标准均不达标。某些情况下有益药物的总体处方存在不足——例如,心肌梗死后仅38%(11/29)(95%置信区间20%至58%)的患者被开具β受体阻滞剂。在过去两年(心脏病)或过去一年(糖尿病)中测量过血压的心脏病或糖尿病患者比例,在养老院居民中较低:心脏病患者中,74%(17/(23)对96%(122/127)(调整优势比0.18,0.04至0.75);糖尿病患者中,62%(8/13)对96%(50/52)(调整优势比0.05,0.01至0.38)。在潜在有害处方方面,养老院中有更多患者被开具抗精神病药物(28%(49/172)对11%(56/526)(3.82,2.37至6.17))和泻药(39%(67/172)对16%(85/526)(2.79,1.79至4.36))。养老院居民与所开具的抗精神病药物相关的适当诊断读取代码的可能性较小(0.22,0.07至0.71)。
在英国一个城市,老年患者,尤其是养老院中的患者所接受的医疗护理质量不达标。我们建议,对这些患者进行更好的协调护理可避免过度使用不必要或有害药物、有益药物使用不足以及慢性病监测不佳等问题。