Workman Stephen, McKeever Patricia, Harvey William, Singer Peter A
Division of General Internal Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
J Crit Care. 2003 Mar;18(1):17-21. doi: 10.1053/jcrc.2003.YJCRC4.
This study was conducted to develop an empiric description of intensive care unit (ICU) physicians' and nurses' (participants) experiences providing life-sustaining treatments at the insistence of family members, treatments that they believed should have been withheld or withdrawn. From this description, steps to minimize or prevent their sources of distress in such situations are suggested.
Semistructured, open-ended interviews. Participants were asked to describe cases in which treatment had been provided primarily in response to demands from family members.
Six physicians and 6 nurses from 6 university-affiliated ICUs in Canada. All were members of a task force developing a multicenter policy to address demands for treatment, and physician members were heads of their ICUs.
Systematic analysis of interview transcripts and synthesis of findings.
Participants recalled 28 cases in which treatment had been provided at the insistence of family members. Many cases described were very distressing for both medical staff and family members. Consistently problematic areas included: (1) suffering of dying patients, (2) the marked distress of family members, and (3) a breakdown in the relationship between care providers and families.
Conflict with family members about decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment can be very stressful for health care providers. Three important areas that give rise to distress were identified in this study. These key sources of distress should be looked for. They could be addressed by: (1) identifying to family members the importance of minimizing suffering and ongoing bodily injury of patients at risk for dying, (2) by doing so addressing directly the distress of family members by the provision of emotional support, and when appropriate directed toward helping them accept that the patient is dying, and (3) pursuing efforts to maintain or create a good relationship with family members despite disagreement about the appropriateness of continuing life-sustaining treatment.
本研究旨在对重症监护病房(ICU)医生和护士(参与者)在家庭成员坚持下提供维持生命治疗的经历进行实证描述,这些治疗是他们认为本应停止或撤销的。基于此描述,提出在这种情况下尽量减少或预防他们痛苦来源的措施。
半结构化、开放式访谈。要求参与者描述主要因家庭成员要求而提供治疗的案例。
来自加拿大6所大学附属医院ICU的6名医生和6名护士。他们都是一个制定多中心政策以应对治疗需求的特别工作组的成员,医生成员是各自ICU的负责人。
对访谈记录进行系统分析并综合研究结果。
参与者回忆起28例在家庭成员坚持下提供治疗的案例。所描述的许多案例对医护人员和家庭成员来说都非常痛苦。一直存在问题的领域包括:(1)濒死患者的痛苦,(2)家庭成员的明显痛苦,以及(3)护理人员与家庭之间关系的破裂。
在限制维持生命治疗的决策上与家庭成员发生冲突,对医护人员来说可能压力极大。本研究确定了导致痛苦的三个重要领域。应寻找这些关键的痛苦来源。可以通过以下方式解决:(1)向家庭成员表明尽量减少濒死风险患者的痛苦和持续身体伤害的重要性,(2)通过提供情感支持直接解决家庭成员的痛苦,并在适当时帮助他们接受患者即将死亡的事实,以及(3)尽管在继续维持生命治疗的适当性上存在分歧,但仍努力维持或建立与家庭成员的良好关系。