生命末期讨论、目标达成和生命末期的痛苦:与偏好一致的护理接受的预测因素和结果。

End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences.

机构信息

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Pediatric Oncology, 44 Binney St-454, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1203-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4672. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Physicians have an ethical obligation to honor patients' values for care, including at the end of life (EOL). We sought to evaluate factors that help patients to receive care consistent with their preferences.

METHODS

This was a longitudinal multi-institutional cohort study. We measured baseline preferences for life-extending versus symptom-directed care and actual EOL care received in 325 patients with advanced cancer. We also measured associated sociodemographic, health, and communication characteristics, including EOL discussions between patients and physicians.

RESULTS

Preferences were assessed a median of 125 days before death. Overall, 68% of patients (220 of 325 patients) received EOL care consistent with baseline preferences. The proportion was slightly higher among patients who recognized they were terminally ill (74%, 90 of 121 patients; P = .05). Patients who recognized their terminal illness were more likely to prefer symptom-directed care (83%, 100 of 121 patients; v 66%, 127 of 191 patients; P = .003). However, some patients who were aware they were terminally ill wished to receive life-extending care (17%, 21 of 121 patients). Patients who reported having discussed their wishes for EOL care with a physician (39%, 125 of 322 patients) were more likely to receive care that was consistent with their preferences, both in the full sample (odds ratio [OR] = 2.26; P < .0001) and among patients who were aware they were terminally ill (OR = 3.94; P = .0005). Among patients who received no life-extending measures, physical distress was lower (mean score, 3.1 v 4.1; P = .03) among patients for whom such care was consistent with preferences.

CONCLUSION

Patients with cancer are more likely to receive EOL care that is consistent with their preferences when they have had the opportunity to discuss their wishes for EOL care with a physician.

摘要

目的

医生有责任尊重患者对治疗的价值观,包括在生命末期(EOL)。我们旨在评估有助于患者接受与其偏好相符的治疗的因素。

方法

这是一项纵向多机构队列研究。我们在 325 名晚期癌症患者中测量了他们对延长生命与对症治疗的偏好基线以及在 EOL 时实际接受的治疗。我们还测量了相关的社会人口学、健康和沟通特征,包括患者和医生之间的 EOL 讨论。

结果

偏好评估中位数为死亡前 125 天。总体而言,68%的患者(325 名患者中的 220 名)接受了与基线偏好相符的 EOL 治疗。在认识到自己处于终末期的患者中,这一比例略高(74%,121 名患者中的 90 名;P=.05)。认识到自己处于终末期的患者更倾向于选择对症治疗(83%,121 名患者中的 100 名;v 66%,191 名患者中的 127 名;P=.003)。然而,一些认识到自己处于终末期的患者希望接受延长生命的治疗(17%,121 名患者中的 21 名)。报告与医生讨论过 EOL 治疗意愿的患者(39%,322 名患者中的 125 名)更有可能接受与其偏好相符的治疗,这在整个样本中(优势比[OR] = 2.26;P<.0001)和在认识到自己处于终末期的患者中(OR = 3.94;P=.0005)都是如此。在未接受任何延长生命措施的患者中,与治疗偏好相符的患者的身体痛苦程度较低(平均评分,3.1 v 4.1;P=.03)。

结论

当患者有机会与医生讨论他们对 EOL 治疗的意愿时,他们更有可能接受与其偏好相符的 EOL 治疗。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索