Loutfi Mohamed, Mulvihill Niall T, Boccalatte Marco, Farah Bruno, Fajadet Jean, Marco Jean
Unite de Cardiologie Interventionelle, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003 Apr;58(4):451-4. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10455.
Clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is significantly worse in diabetic patients in comparison to nondiabetic patients. The subset of diabetic patients in the ARTS trial treated with multivessel stenting had the lowest 1-year event-free survival. We examined our experience of multivessel PCI in diabetics to assess clinical outcome outside clinical trials and to determine if repeat revascularizations are the result of restenosis or the progression of nontreated disease. Between January 2000 and December 2001, we performed multivessel PCI in 99 diabetic patients. Our group was well matched with those in the ARTS trial, with mean age of 69 +/- 8 years, male sex 70%, hypertension 68%, hypercholesterolemia 51%, and mean LV ejection fraction 60%. The mean number of diseased segments treated was 2.8 +/- 0.9 and 56% of the patients had three-vessel disease. There were 2.3 +/- 0.6 stents implanted per patient. Target vessels included the LAD in 90%, LCx in 77%, and the RCA in 87% of cases. The in-hospital MACE rate was 8%, which included eight nonfatal MI but no deaths or repeat revascularizations. After a mean follow-up of 14 +/- 8 months, there were 4 deaths (4%), no further MIs, and 21 (21%) repeat revascularizations (2 CABG; 19 PCI), giving a 1-year event-free survival of 67%. There were 18 repeat revascularizations (2 CABG; 16 PCI) for restenosis, but in 9 of the 18 (50%) patients treatment was also required for progression of disease. Three further patients had PCI for symptomatic disease progression without restenosis. Thus, disease progression contributed to 57% of repeat revascularization procedures. The medium- and longer-term success of multivessel PCI in diabetic patients is limited principally by the need for repeat revascularization. However, it is important to realize that these revascularizations are performed not only for restenosis but also for disease progression in more than 50% of patients. Consequently, even if drug-eluting stent technology can eliminate restenosis, disease progression will continue to impact the clinical outcome of diabetic patients after PCI.
与非糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的临床结局明显更差。ARTS试验中接受多支血管支架置入治疗的糖尿病患者亚组的1年无事件生存率最低。我们研究了我们在糖尿病患者中进行多支血管PCI的经验,以评估临床试验之外的临床结局,并确定再次血运重建是再狭窄还是未治疗疾病进展的结果。在2000年1月至2001年12月期间,我们对99例糖尿病患者进行了多支血管PCI。我们的研究组与ARTS试验中的患者匹配良好,平均年龄为69±8岁,男性占70%,高血压患者占68%,高胆固醇血症患者占51%,左心室射血分数平均为60%。治疗的病变节段平均数量为2.8±0.9个,56%的患者患有三支血管病变。每位患者植入支架的平均数量为2.3±0.6个。靶血管包括90%的左前降支、77%的左旋支和87%的右冠状动脉。住院期间主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率为8%,其中包括8例非致命性心肌梗死,但无死亡或再次血运重建。平均随访14±8个月后,有4例死亡(4%),无进一步心肌梗死,21例(21%)再次血运重建(2例冠状动脉旁路移植术;19例PCI),1年无事件生存率为67%。有18例因再狭窄而进行再次血运重建(2例冠状动脉旁路移植术;16例PCI),但在这18例患者中有9例(50%)因疾病进展也需要治疗。另外3例患者因有症状的疾病进展而非再狭窄接受了PCI。因此,疾病进展导致了57%的再次血运重建手术。糖尿病患者多支血管PCI的中期和长期成功率主要受再次血运重建需求的限制。然而,重要的是要认识到,这些血运重建不仅是为了治疗再狭窄,而且在超过50%的患者中是为了治疗疾病进展。因此,即使药物洗脱支架技术可以消除再狭窄,疾病进展仍将继续影响糖尿病患者PCI后的临床结局。