Yeh Gloria Y, Eisenberg David M, Kaptchuk Ted J, Phillips Russell S
Division for Research and Education in Complementary and Integrative Medical Therapies, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2003 Apr;26(4):1277-94. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.4.1277.
To conduct a systematic review of the published literature on the efficacy and safety of herbal therapies and vitamin/mineral supplements for glucose control in patients with diabetes.
We conducted an electronic literature search of MEDLINE, OLDMEDLINE, Cochrane Library Database, and HealthSTAR, from database inception to May 2002, in addition to performing hand searches and consulting with experts in the field. Available clinical studies published in the English language that used human participants and examined glycemic control were included. Data were extracted in a standardized manner, and two independent investigators assessed methodological quality of randomized controlled trials using the Jadad scale.
A total of 108 trials examining 36 herbs (single or in combination) and 9 vitamin/mineral supplements, involving 4,565 patients with diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance, met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. There were 58 controlled clinical trials involving individuals with diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance (42 randomized and 16 nonrandomized trials). Most studies involved patients with type 2 diabetes. Heterogeneity and the small number of studies per supplement precluded formal meta-analyses. Of these 58 trials, the direction of the evidence for improved glucose control was positive in 76% (44 of 58). Very few adverse effects were reported.
There is still insufficient evidence to draw definitive conclusions about the efficacy of individual herbs and supplements for diabetes; however, they appear to be generally safe. The available data suggest that several supplements may warrant further study. The best evidence for efficacy from adequately designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is available for Coccinia indica and American ginseng. Chromium has been the most widely studied supplement. Other supplements with positive preliminary results include Gymnema sylvestre, Aloe vera, vanadium, Momordica charantia, and nopal.
对已发表的关于草药疗法及维生素/矿物质补充剂对糖尿病患者血糖控制的疗效和安全性的文献进行系统综述。
我们对MEDLINE、OLDMEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆数据库和HealthSTAR进行了电子文献检索,检索时间从数据库建立至2002年5月,此外还进行了手工检索并咨询了该领域的专家。纳入了以英文发表的、使用人类受试者并研究血糖控制情况的现有临床研究。数据以标准化方式提取,两名独立研究者使用Jadad量表评估随机对照试验的方法学质量。
共有108项试验符合纳入标准并进行了分析,这些试验研究了36种草药(单一或联合使用)和9种维生素/矿物质补充剂,涉及4565例糖尿病或糖耐量受损患者。有58项对照临床试验涉及糖尿病或糖耐量受损个体(42项随机试验和16项非随机试验)。大多数研究涉及2型糖尿病患者。由于异质性以及每种补充剂的研究数量较少,无法进行正式的荟萃分析。在这58项试验中,76%(58项中的44项)的证据表明血糖控制改善的方向为正向。报告的不良反应很少。
关于个别草药和补充剂对糖尿病的疗效,仍没有足够的证据得出明确结论;然而,它们似乎总体上是安全的。现有数据表明,几种补充剂可能值得进一步研究。来自设计充分的随机对照试验(RCT)的最佳疗效证据适用于印度南瓜和西洋参。铬是研究最广泛的补充剂。其他初步结果为阳性的补充剂包括匙羹藤、芦荟(库拉索芦荟)、钒、苦瓜和仙人掌。