Mourad W A, Tulbah A, Shoukri M, Al Dayel F, Akhtar M, Ali M A, Hainau B, Martin J
Department of Pathology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Diagn Cytopathol. 2003 Apr;28(4):191-5. doi: 10.1002/dc.10268.
The Revised European American lymphoma (REAL) and World Health Organization (WHO) classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) relies on the constellation of cytologic, phenotypic, genotypic, and clinical characteristics of NHL. For the most part, the classification does not rely on architectural pattern for classification of neoplasms. This classification makes it possible to diagnose and classify lymphomas by fine-needle aspiration (FNA). In this study, we attempted to evaluate the accuracy of FNA in diagnosing and classifying NHL within the context of the REAL/WHO classifications. Cases included only those in which FNA was the primary diagnosis, followed by a surgical biopsy for confirmation. Flow cytometry (FCM) for phenotyping was carried out whenever material was available. Two groups of pathologists were identified. Group A consisted of pathologists with background training in cytopathology and/or hematopathology (three pathologists). Group B consisted of experienced surgical pathologists with no training in cytopathology and/or hematopathology (four pathologists). Seventy-four cases were included in the study. FCM phenotyping was performed in 53 cases (71%). Large cell lymphoma constituted 63% of the cases. The remaining lymphomas included Burkitt's, small lymphocytic, lymphoblastic, follicle center cell, Ki-1, mantle cell, marginal zone, and natural killer cell lymphoma. The diagnosis of lymphoma was rendered for all cases. The correct classification was seen in 63% of the cases. Classification was more accurate in immunophenotyped than in nonimmunophenotyped cases (84% vs 33%; P = 0.00004). Group A pathologists showed higher incidence of proper classification than group B (80% vs 56%; P = 0.046). The diagnosis and classification of NHL can be achieved in a large number of cases on FNA material. This accuracy can be increased if cytomorphologic criteria are established for different entities of NHL aided by FCM for phenotyping.
欧美淋巴瘤修订版(REAL)和世界卫生组织(WHO)对非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)的分类依赖于NHL的细胞学、表型、基因型和临床特征。在很大程度上,该分类不依赖肿瘤的结构模式进行分类。这种分类使得通过细针穿刺抽吸(FNA)诊断和分类淋巴瘤成为可能。在本研究中,我们试图在REAL/WHO分类的背景下评估FNA诊断和分类NHL的准确性。病例仅包括那些以FNA作为初步诊断,随后通过手术活检进行确诊的病例。只要有材料,就进行流式细胞术(FCM)表型分析。确定了两组病理学家。A组由具有细胞病理学和/或血液病理学背景培训的病理学家组成(三名病理学家)。B组由没有细胞病理学和/或血液病理学培训的经验丰富的外科病理学家组成(四名病理学家)。74例病例纳入研究。53例(71%)进行了FCM表型分析。大细胞淋巴瘤占病例的63%。其余淋巴瘤包括伯基特淋巴瘤、小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤、淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤、滤泡中心细胞淋巴瘤、Ki-1淋巴瘤、套细胞淋巴瘤、边缘区淋巴瘤和自然杀伤细胞淋巴瘤。所有病例均做出了淋巴瘤诊断。63%的病例分类正确。免疫表型分析的病例分类比非免疫表型分析的病例更准确(84%对33%;P = 0.00004)。A组病理学家正确分类的发生率高于B组(80%对56%;P = 0.046)。FNA材料可对大量NHL病例进行诊断和分类。如果在FCM表型分析的辅助下为不同的NHL实体建立细胞形态学标准,准确性可以提高。