Seidman Daniel S, Moise Jonathan, Ergaz Zivanit, Laor Arie, Vreman Hendrik J, Stevenson David K, Gale Rena
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chain Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
J Perinatol. 2003 Mar;23(2):123-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210862.
To determine the efficacy of blue versus blue-green phototherapy using new light sources with narrow luminous spectra. The devices made of high-intensity gallium nitride light-emitting diodes (LEDs) were also compared to conventional halogen-quartz bulbs phototherapy.
Prospective open randomized study.
A total of 114 jaundiced, but otherwise healthy term infants who met the entry criteria for phototherapy set by the American Academy of Pediatrics' Practice Parameter.
The duration of phototherapy and the rate of decrease in total serum bilirubin (TSB).
The mean TSB concentrations at initiation and termination of treatment, as well as the duration of phototherapy and the rate of decrease in TSB, were not statistically different in newborns receiving blue LED, blue-green LED or conventional phototherapy. The average rate of decrease in TSB (slope), after adjustment by a linear regression analysis for confounding factors, was -3.61 micromol/hour (95% confidence limits -5.47, -1.75) in the 25 newborns receiving blue LED phototherapy compared with -2.57 micromol/hour (-4.32, -0.82) in the 22 newborns treated with blue-green LED phototherapy and -3.42 micromol/hour (-5.02, -1.81) in the 57 newborns who received conventional phototherapy.
When using low light irradiance, there was no statistically significant difference in the effectiveness of phototherapy using blue-green LEDs, blue LEDs or conventional halogen-quartz bulbs.
使用具有窄发光光谱的新型光源,确定蓝光与蓝绿光光疗的疗效。还将由高强度氮化镓发光二极管(LED)制成的设备与传统卤化石英灯泡光疗进行比较。
前瞻性开放随机研究。
共有114名黄疸但其他方面健康的足月儿,他们符合美国儿科学会实践参数设定的光疗入选标准。
光疗持续时间和总血清胆红素(TSB)下降速率。
接受蓝光LED、蓝绿光LED或传统光疗的新生儿,治疗开始和结束时的平均TSB浓度、光疗持续时间以及TSB下降速率,在统计学上无显著差异。在对25名接受蓝光LED光疗的新生儿进行线性回归分析以校正混杂因素后,TSB的平均下降速率(斜率)为-3.61微摩尔/小时(95%置信区间-5.47,-1.75),而22名接受蓝绿光LED光疗的新生儿为-2.57微摩尔/小时(-4.32,-0.82),57名接受传统光疗的新生儿为-3.42微摩尔/小时(-5.02,-1.81)。
在低光照强度下,使用蓝绿光LED、蓝光LED或传统卤化石英灯泡进行光疗的效果在统计学上无显著差异。