Pollack Craig Evan
University of California, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.
Death Stud. 2003 Feb-Mar;27(2):125-42. doi: 10.1080/07481180302893.
In the aftermath of tragedy, memorials and grave sites are frequently constructed. Research needs to pay attention to the goals of mourners for such places. The 1995 massacre at Srebrenica in Bosnia-Herzegovina left over 7,000 Muslim men missing and presumed dead. Five years later, families fought to bury the remains that had been collected. Qualitative interviews with 67 people, including survivors and key informants were completed over the summer of 2000. This article examines the intentions of the burial from the perspective of two groups of family members who lost loved ones: survivors who remain politically isolated and those involved in advocacy or political organizations. For the politically isolated, burial was important in reshaping individual mourning after mass death and in the face of unidentified remains. For those involved in advocacy groups, burial was a means of recognizing the past massacre, understanding the massacre's impact on current political divisions, and shaping future directions. Both mourning and political functions are elaborated on in the setting of Bosnian culture and society.
在悲剧发生后,纪念场所和墓地常常被修建起来。研究需要关注哀悼者对于此类场所的诉求。1995年在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的斯雷布雷尼察发生的大屠杀导致7000多名穆斯林男子失踪并被推定死亡。五年后,家属们为埋葬已收集到的遗体而抗争。2000年夏天,对包括幸存者和关键信息提供者在内的67人进行了定性访谈。本文从两组失去亲人的家属的角度审视了埋葬的意图:在政治上处于孤立状态的幸存者以及参与倡导活动或政治组织的人。对于政治上孤立的人来说,埋葬在大规模死亡后重塑个人哀悼以及面对身份不明的遗体方面至关重要。对于那些参与倡导团体的人来说,埋葬是承认过去大屠杀、理解大屠杀对当前政治分歧的影响以及塑造未来方向的一种方式。在波斯尼亚的文化和社会背景下,哀悼和政治功能都得到了阐述。