• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Human factors engineering design demonstrations can enlighten your RCA team.人因工程设计演示可以启发你的根本原因分析团队。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Apr;12(2):119-21. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.2.119.
2
John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety Awards. System innovation: Veterans Health Administration National Center for Patient Safety.约翰·M·艾森伯格患者安全奖。系统创新:退伍军人健康管理局国家患者安全中心。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Dec;28(12):660-5. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28071-2.
3
Human factors engineering and patient safety.人因工程学与患者安全。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):352-4. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.352.
4
An Analysis of Adverse Events in the Rehabilitation Department: Using the Veterans Affairs Root Cause Analysis System.对康复科不良事件的分析:利用退伍军人事务部根本原因分析系统。
Phys Ther. 2018 Apr 1;98(4):223-230. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy003.
5
The Veterans Affairs root cause analysis system in action.退伍军人事务部根本原因分析系统在运行中。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Oct;28(10):531-45. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28057-8.
6
Developing a culture of patient safety at the VA.在退伍军人事务部营造患者安全文化。
Ambul Outreach. 2000 Spring:25-9.
7
Conversations. Patient safety requires systems, culture change. Interview by Ed Rabinowitz.对话。患者安全需要系统和文化变革。埃德·拉比诺维茨访谈。
AHIP Cover. 2004 May-Jun;45(3):62-4, 66.
8
Patient safety: what is really at issue?患者安全:真正的问题所在是什么?
Front Health Serv Manage. 2005 Fall;22(1):3-16.
9
How root-cause analysis can improve patient safety.根本原因分析如何提高患者安全。
Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 2001 Oct;13(10):2-12, 1.
10
Root cause analysis of serious adverse events among older patients in the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局老年患者严重不良事件的根本原因分析
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014 Jun;40(6):253-62. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(14)40034-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A review of accident models and incident analysis techniques.事故模型与事件分析技术综述。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Mar;26(3):e14623. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14623. Epub 2025 Feb 2.
2
Generic analysis method to learn from serious adverse events in Dutch hospitals: a human factors perspective.从荷兰医院严重不良事件中学习的通用分析方法:人为因素视角。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Feb;11(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001637.
3
Contributing factors to severe complications after liver resection: an aggregate root cause analysis in 105 consecutive patients.肝切除术后严重并发症的相关因素:对105例连续患者的汇总根本原因分析
Patient Saf Surg. 2020 Sep 29;14:36. doi: 10.1186/s13037-020-00261-7. eCollection 2020.
4
Interdisciplinary Systems-Based Intervention to Improve IV Hydration during Parenteral Administration of Acyclovir.基于跨学科系统的干预措施以改善阿昔洛韦静脉给药期间的静脉补液情况。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2016 Jan-Feb;69(1):7-13. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v69i1.1517.
5
An evidence-based toolkit for the development of effective and sustainable root cause analysis system safety solutions.一个用于开发有效且可持续的根本原因分析系统安全解决方案的循证工具包。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2013;33(2):11-20. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21122.

本文引用的文献

1
The Veterans Affairs root cause analysis system in action.退伍军人事务部根本原因分析系统在运行中。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Oct;28(10):531-45. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28057-8.
2
Human factors in the health care facility.医疗保健机构中的人为因素。
Biomed Instrum Technol. 1998 May-Jun;32(3):311-6.
3
A human-centered approach to medical informatics for medical students, residents, and practicing clinicians.一种面向医学生、住院医师和执业临床医生的以人文为中心的医学信息学方法。
Acad Med. 1997 Oct;72(10):881-7.

人因工程设计演示可以启发你的根本原因分析团队。

Human factors engineering design demonstrations can enlighten your RCA team.

作者信息

Gosbee J, Anderson T

机构信息

National Center for Patient Safety, Department of Veterans Affairs, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, USA.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Apr;12(2):119-21. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.2.119.

DOI:10.1136/qhc.12.2.119
PMID:12679508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1743682/
Abstract

A case study is presented, based on the experience of the US Veterans Affairs health system, which shows the benefits of healthcare personnel understanding human factors engineering (HFE) and how it relates to patient safety. After HFE training, personnel are better able to use a systems-oriented approach during adverse event analysis. Without some appreciation of HFE, the focus of adverse event analyses (e.g. root cause analysis (RCA)) is often misguided towards policies or an individual's shortcomings, leading to ineffective solutions. The case study followed the investigation by an RCA team of a retained sponge following cardiac surgery. The team began with a focus on the specific failings of the surgical nurse and outdated policies. HFE design demonstrations were used to redirect the team's focus to more systems-oriented issues, which could be uncovered even when events appeared to be related to policy or training, and to point them towards examining the design of systems that contributed to the event. The team was thus able to identify design flaws and make improvements to the design of the forms and computer systems that were key to preventing such events from recurring.

摘要

本文基于美国退伍军人事务部医疗系统的经验进行了案例研究,该研究展示了医护人员了解人因工程学(HFE)及其与患者安全的关系所带来的益处。经过HFE培训后,人员在不良事件分析过程中能够更好地采用系统导向的方法。如果对HFE缺乏一定的认识,不良事件分析(如根本原因分析(RCA))的重点往往会被误导到政策或个人缺点上,从而导致无效的解决方案。该案例研究跟踪了一个RCA团队对心脏手术后遗留海绵事件的调查。团队一开始关注的是外科护士的具体失误和过时的政策。HFE设计演示被用来将团队的重点重新导向更多面向系统的问题,即使事件看似与政策或培训有关,这些问题也能被发现,并引导他们检查导致该事件的系统设计。这样,团队就能识别出设计缺陷,并对防止此类事件再次发生的关键表格和计算机系统设计进行改进。