• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Human factors engineering and patient safety.人因工程学与患者安全。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):352-4. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.352.
2
Human factors engineering design demonstrations can enlighten your RCA team.人因工程设计演示可以启发你的根本原因分析团队。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Apr;12(2):119-21. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.2.119.
3
An overlooked alliance: using human factors engineering to reduce patient harm.
Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004 Aug;30(8):455-9. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(04)30052-3.
4
Turning the tide on medical errors in intensive care units: a human factors approach.扭转重症监护病房医疗差错的局面:一种人为因素方法。
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2004 Jul-Aug;23(4):169-75. doi: 10.1097/00003465-200407000-00007.
5
From patients to politicians: a cognitive engineering view of patient safety.从患者到政治家:患者安全的认知工程视角
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):302-4. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.302.
6
Conclusion: You need human factors engineering expertise to see design hazards that are hiding in "plain sight!".
Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004 Dec;30(12):696-700. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(04)30083-3.
7
Developing a culture of patient safety at the VA.在退伍军人事务部营造患者安全文化。
Ambul Outreach. 2000 Spring:25-9.
8
SEIPS 3.0: Human-centered design of the patient journey for patient safety.SEIPS 3.0:以患者安全为中心的患者就医流程的人因工程设计。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103033. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103033. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
9
Human factors and ergonomics as a patient safety practice.人为因素与工效学作为患者安全实践。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Mar;23(3):196-205. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001812. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
10
Using safety tools to prevent system-related errors.使用安全工具预防与系统相关的错误。
AORN J. 2009 Jun;89(6):969-70. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2009.05.019.

引用本文的文献

1
Convergent parallel mixed-methods study to understand the impact of decision-making for congenital cardiac surgery patients at a tertiary paediatric hospital: a study protocol.一项在三级儿科医院开展的关于了解先天性心脏手术患者决策影响的收敛平行混合方法研究:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 12;15(8):e099080. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099080.
2
Acceptability and Feasibility of Callascope Self-Imaging of the Cervix among Women in Ventanilla, Peru: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study.秘鲁文塔尼利亚女性中使用Callascope进行宫颈自我成像的可接受性和可行性:一项混合方法试点研究
J Womens Health Reprod Med. 2021;5(3). Epub 2021 Apr 2.
3
Using human factors principles to redesign a 3D lab workflow during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间运用人因工程学原理重新设计3D实验室工作流程。
3D Print Med. 2022 Nov 12;8(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s41205-022-00161-9.
4
Investigating the Potential for Clinical Decision Support in Sub-Saharan Africa With AFYA (Artificial Intelligence-Based Assessment of Health Symptoms in Tanzania): Protocol for a Prospective, Observational Pilot Study.利用AFYA(坦桑尼亚基于人工智能的健康症状评估)调查撒哈拉以南非洲临床决策支持的潜力:一项前瞻性观察性试点研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jun 7;11(6):e34298. doi: 10.2196/34298.
5
Using simulation to iteratively test and re-design a cognitive aid for use in the management of severe local anaesthetic toxicity.利用模拟反复测试并重新设计一种用于管理严重局部麻醉药毒性的认知辅助工具。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2017 Dec 9;4(1):4-12. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000221. eCollection 2018.
6
Comment on "Accuracy and usability of a diagnostic decision support system in the diagnosis of three representative rheumatic diseases: a randomized controlled trial among medical students".对《诊断决策支持系统在三种代表性风湿性疾病诊断中的准确性和可用性:医学生中的一项随机对照试验》的评论
Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Apr 4;24(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02770-5.
7
How to specify healthcare process improvements collaboratively using rapid, remote consensus-building: a framework and a case study of its application.如何使用快速、远程的共识构建来共同指定医疗保健流程改进:一个框架及其应用案例研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 May 11;21(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01288-9.
8
What hinders the uptake of computerized decision support systems in hospitals? A qualitative study and framework for implementation.阻碍医院采用计算机化决策支持系统的因素是什么?一项定性研究与实施框架。
Implement Sci. 2017 Sep 15;12(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0644-2.
9
Fall Prevention Self-Assessments Via Mobile 3D Visualization Technologies: Community Dwelling Older Adults' Perceptions of Opportunities and Challenges.通过移动3D可视化技术进行的跌倒预防自我评估:社区居住老年人对机遇与挑战的看法
JMIR Hum Factors. 2017 Jun 19;4(2):e15. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.7161.
10
Incidence of "never events" among weekend admissions versus weekday admissions to US hospitals: national analysis.美国医院周末入院与工作日入院的“绝不姑息事件”发生率:全国性分析。
BMJ. 2015 Apr 15;350:h1460. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1460.

本文引用的文献

1
Safe but sound: patient safety meets evidence-based medicine.安全且可靠:患者安全与循证医学相遇。
JAMA. 2002;288(4):508-13. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.4.508.
2
The wrong patient.错误的患者。
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jun 4;136(11):826-33. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-11-200206040-00012.
3
How to investigate and analyse clinical incidents: clinical risk unit and association of litigation and risk management protocol.如何调查与分析临床事件:临床风险部门以及诉讼与风险管理协议协会
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):777-81. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.777.
4
Human factors in the health care facility.医疗保健机构中的人为因素。
Biomed Instrum Technol. 1998 May-Jun;32(3):311-6.
5
Human error and human factors engineering in health care.
Biomed Instrum Technol. 1997 Nov-Dec;31(6):627-31.
6
Human factors and the FDA's goals: improved medical device design.人为因素与美国食品药品监督管理局的目标:改进医疗器械设计。
Biomed Instrum Technol. 1996 Mar-Apr;30(2):107-9.
7
What are we really monitoring?
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1994 Jun;22(3):320-1.
8
A monitor with a mind of its own.
Anesthesiology. 1995 Jan;82(1):317-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199501000-00049.

人因工程学与患者安全。

Human factors engineering and patient safety.

作者信息

Gosbee J

机构信息

National Center for Patients Safety, Department of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, USA.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):352-4. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.352.

DOI:10.1136/qhc.11.4.352
PMID:12468696
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1758019/
Abstract

The case study and analyses presented here illustrate the crucial role of human factors engineering (HFE) in patient safety. HFE is a framework for efficient and constructive thinking which includes methods and tools to help healthcare teams perform patient safety analyses, such as root cause analyses. The literature on HFE over several decades contains theories and applied studies to help to solve difficult patient safety problems and design issues. A case study is presented which illustrates the vulnerabilities of human factors design in a transport monitor. The subsequent analysis highlights how to move beyond the more obvious contributing factors like training to design problems and the establishment of informal norms. General advice is offered to address these issues and design issues specific to this case are discussed.

摘要

本文所呈现的案例研究与分析表明了人因工程学(HFE)在患者安全方面的关键作用。人因工程学是一个用于高效且建设性思考的框架,其中包括有助于医疗团队进行患者安全分析(如根本原因分析) 的方法和工具。几十年来关于人因工程学的文献包含了有助于解决棘手患者安全问题和设计问题的理论与应用研究。文中给出了一个案例研究,该研究阐述了运输监测器中人因设计的薄弱环节。随后的分析突出了如何超越诸如培训等较为明显的促成因素,进而关注设计问题以及非正式规范的形成。文中提供了应对这些问题的一般性建议,并讨论了该案例特有的设计问题。