Itoh Saotomo, Kazumi Yuko, Abe Chiyoji, Takahashi Mitsuyoshi
Bacteriology Division, The Research Institute of Tuberculosis, Japan Antituberculosis Association, Kiyose-shi, Tokyo 204-8533, Japan.
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Apr;41(4):1656-63. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.4.1656-1663.2003.
In a previous study, we have evaluated genetic identification by using the rpoB gene, which was recently introduced by Kim et al. (J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2102-2109, 2001; J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1714-1720, 1999). In this process, we examined the rpoB gene heterogeneity of clinical isolates identified as Mycobacterium gordonae with the conventional biological and biochemical tests and/or a commercially available DNA probe kit. Sequencing of the rpoB gene of 34 clinical isolates revealed that M. gordonae clinical isolates were classified into four major clusters (A, B, C, and D). Interestingly, organisms belonging to cluster D (15 isolates) did not hybridize with M. gordonae ATCC 14470 and specifically possessed urease activity. Therefore, it could be considered to be a novel mycobacterium. The identification of M. gordonae is known to have ambiguous results sometimes. On the other hand, identification of clinical isolates seems to be inconvenient and unsuitable because of a more than 99% 16S rRNA gene similarity value between clusters. These findings suggest that the existence of M. gordonae-like mycobacteria that share similar biochemical and biological characteristics with the 16S rRNA gene of an M. gordonae type strain but less similarity at the genomic DNA level may have complicated the identification of M. gordonae in many laboratories. Furthermore, compared with hsp65 PCR restriction analysis (PRA), rpoB PRA would have the advantage of producing no ambiguous results because of the intracluster homogeneity of the rpoB gene. In this case, rpoB would provide clearer results than hsp65, even if PRA analysis was used. We demonstrated that these M. gordonae-like mycobacteria were easily distinguished by PRA of the rpoB sequence. Additionally, the significance of this M. gordonae-like cluster may help to establish the comparison between the M. gordonae isolates from a clinical specimen and an infectious process in a given patient and to determine the true incidence of infection with this microorganism.
在之前的一项研究中,我们使用rpoB基因评估了基因鉴定方法,该基因是Kim等人最近引入的(《临床微生物学杂志》39:2102 - 2109,2001;《临床微生物学杂志》37:1714 - 1720,1999)。在此过程中,我们通过传统的生物学和生化试验及/或市售的DNA探针试剂盒,检测了经鉴定为戈登分枝杆菌的临床分离株的rpoB基因异质性。对34株临床分离株的rpoB基因进行测序后发现,戈登分枝杆菌临床分离株可分为四个主要簇(A、B、C和D)。有趣的是,属于簇D的菌株(15株)与戈登分枝杆菌ATCC 14470不杂交,且具有特异性脲酶活性。因此,可认为它是一种新型分枝杆菌。已知戈登分枝杆菌的鉴定有时会产生不明确的结果。另一方面,由于各簇之间16S rRNA基因相似性值超过99%,临床分离株的鉴定似乎既不方便也不合适。这些发现表明,存在与戈登分枝杆菌型菌株的16S rRNA基因具有相似生化和生物学特性,但在基因组DNA水平上相似性较低的戈登分枝杆菌样分枝杆菌,这可能使许多实验室中戈登分枝杆菌的鉴定变得复杂。此外,与hsp65 PCR限制性分析(PRA)相比,rpoB PRA由于rpoB基因在簇内的同质性,具有不会产生不明确结果的优势。在这种情况下,即使使用PRA分析,rpoB也会比hsp65提供更清晰的结果。我们证明,这些戈登分枝杆菌样分枝杆菌可通过rpoB序列的PRA轻松区分。此外,这种戈登分枝杆菌样簇的意义可能有助于建立来自临床标本的戈登分枝杆菌分离株与特定患者感染过程之间的比较,并确定该微生物的真实感染发生率。