Leao Sylvia Cardoso, Tortoli Enrico, Viana-Niero Cristina, Ueki Suely Yoko Mizuka, Lima Karla Valeria Batista, Lopes Maria Luiza, Yubero Jesus, Menendez Maria Carmen, Garcia Maria Jesus
Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP 04023-062, Brazil.
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Sep;47(9):2691-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00808-09. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
An outbreak of postsurgical infections caused by rapidly growing mycobacteria has been ongoing in Brazil since 2004. The degrees of similarity of the rpoB and hsp65 sequences from the clinical isolates and the corresponding sequences from both the Mycobacterium massiliense and the M. bolletii type strains were above the accepted limit for interspecies variability, leading to conflicting identification results. Therefore, an extensive characterization of members of the M. chelonae-M. abscessus group was carried out. The M. abscessus, M. chelonae, M. immunogenum, M. massiliense, and M. bolletii type strains and a subset of clinical isolates were analyzed by biochemical tests, high-performance liquid chromatography, drug susceptibility testing, PCR-restriction enzyme analysis of hsp65 (PRA-hsp65), rpoB, and hsp65 gene sequencing and analysis of phylogenetic trees, DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH), and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of the 16S rRNA gene (RFLP-16S rRNA). The clinical isolates and the M. abscessus, M. massiliense, and M. bolletii type strains could not be separated by phenotypic tests and were grouped in the phylogenetic trees obtained. The results of DDH also confirmed the >70% relatedness of the clinical isolates and the M. abscessus, M. massiliense, and M. bolletii type strains; and indistinguishable RFLP-16S rRNA patterns were obtained. On the contrary, the separation of clinical isolates and the M. abscessus, M. massiliense, and M. bolletii type strains from M. chelonae and M. immunogenum was supported by the results of PRA-hsp65, DDH, and RFLP-16S rRNA and by the rpoB and hsp65 phylogenetic trees. Taken together, these results led to the proposition that M. abscessus, M. massiliense, and M. bolletii represent a single species, that of M. abscessus. Two subspecies are also proposed, M. abscessus subsp. abscessus and M. abscessus subsp. massiliense, and these two subspecies can be distinguished by two different PRA-hsp65 patterns, which differ by a single HaeIII band, and by differences in their rpoB (3.4%) and hsp65 (1.3%) sequences.
自2004年以来,巴西一直在发生由快速生长分枝杆菌引起的术后感染疫情。临床分离株的rpoB和hsp65序列与马赛分枝杆菌和博列特分枝杆菌标准菌株相应序列的相似程度高于种间变异的可接受限度,导致鉴定结果相互矛盾。因此,对龟分枝杆菌-脓肿分枝杆菌菌群的成员进行了广泛的特征分析。通过生化试验、高效液相色谱法、药敏试验、hsp65的PCR-限制性酶切分析(PRA-hsp65)、rpoB、hsp65基因测序以及系统发育树分析、DNA-DNA杂交(DDH)和16S rRNA基因的限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)分析(RFLP-16S rRNA),对脓肿分枝杆菌、龟分枝杆菌、免疫原性分枝杆菌、马赛分枝杆菌和博列特分枝杆菌标准菌株以及一部分临床分离株进行了分析。临床分离株与脓肿分枝杆菌、马赛分枝杆菌和博列特分枝杆菌标准菌株无法通过表型试验区分,并且在所得的系统发育树中归为一组。DDH结果也证实了临床分离株与脓肿分枝杆菌、马赛分枝杆菌和博列特分枝杆菌标准菌株的相关性>70%;并且获得了无法区分的RFLP-16S rRNA图谱。相反,PRA-hsp65、DDH和RFLP-16S rRNA的结果以及rpoB和hsp65系统发育树支持将临床分离株与脓肿分枝杆菌、马赛分枝杆菌和博列特分枝杆菌标准菌株与龟分枝杆菌和免疫原性分枝杆菌区分开来。综合这些结果,得出以下结论:脓肿分枝杆菌、马赛分枝杆菌和博列特分枝杆菌代表一个单一物种,即脓肿分枝杆菌。还提出了两个亚种,脓肿分枝杆菌脓肿亚种和脓肿分枝杆菌马赛亚种,这两个亚种可以通过两种不同的PRA-hsp65图谱区分,这两种图谱仅相差一条HaeIII带,并且它们的rpoB(3.4%)和hsp65(1.3%)序列也存在差异。