Seaton R A, Trevett A J, Wembri J P, Nwokolo N, Naraqi S, Black J, Laurenson I F, Kevau I, Saweri A, Lalloo D G, Warrell D A
Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Papua New Guinea, Port Moresby, Papua, New Guinea.
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1998 Mar;92(2):133-9.
An open-label, randomized, controlled trial was used to compare the safety and efficacy of intramuscular artemether (a loading dose of 3.2 mg/kg, followed by 1.6 mg/kg daily for 4 days) and intravenous quinine (a loading dose of 20 mg quinine dihydrochloride/kg, followed first by 10 mg/kg every 8 h, each injection taking 4 h, for at least 48 h, and then oral quinine for a total of 7 days) in the management of strictly defined severe/complicated malaria in Melanesian adults. Four (12%) of the 33 patients who enrolled and completed follow-up died (one of the 15 who received artemether and three of the 18 who received quinine). Overall, cerebral malaria was uncommon (6%) whilst jaundice was common (76%). The time taken to clear 50% of parasites was less in those treated with artemether (median = 8 h; range = 2-24 h) than in the patients given quinine (median = 14 h; range = 2-25 h; P = 0.05). Temperature defervescence was also quicker in those treated with artemether (median = 32 hours; range = 20-112 h) than in those in the quinine group (median = 48 h; range = 28-88 h; P = 0.034). Hypoglycaemia was not observed in any patient treated with artemether but complicated therapy in 11 (79%) of the 14 patients given quinine who had not had pre-treatment spontaneous hypoglycaemia. No serious adverse effects were attributable to artemether. The Plasmodium falciparum infections observed during the 1 month of follow-up, in three patients who had received artemether and two who had been given quinine, were probably due to recrudescence. Plasmodium vivax parasitaemias were also observed during follow-up, in one or two patients in each treatment group. Artemether appears safe in Melanesian adults and is probably as effective as intravenous quinine in the treatment of severe or complicated falciparum malaria.
一项开放标签、随机、对照试验用于比较肌肉注射蒿甲醚(负荷剂量3.2mg/kg,随后每日1.6mg/kg,共4天)和静脉注射奎宁(负荷剂量20mg二盐酸奎宁/kg,随后先每8小时10mg/kg,每次注射持续4小时,至少48小时,然后口服奎宁共7天)在治疗美拉尼西亚成年患者严格定义的严重/复杂疟疾中的安全性和疗效。33名登记并完成随访的患者中有4名(12%)死亡(接受蒿甲醚治疗的15名患者中有1名,接受奎宁治疗的18名患者中有3名)。总体而言,脑型疟疾不常见(6%),而黄疸常见(76%)。接受蒿甲醚治疗的患者清除50%疟原虫所需时间(中位数=8小时;范围=2 - 24小时)比接受奎宁治疗的患者(中位数=14小时;范围=2 - 25小时;P = 0.05)短。接受蒿甲醚治疗的患者体温退热也比奎宁组更快(中位数=32小时;范围=20 - 112小时)(中位数=48小时;范围=28 - 88小时;P = 0.034)。接受蒿甲醚治疗的患者未观察到低血糖,但14名未进行治疗前自发性低血糖的接受奎宁治疗的患者中有11名(79%)出现复杂治疗情况。未发现与蒿甲醚相关的严重不良反应。在随访的1个月期间,3名接受蒿甲醚治疗的患者和2名接受奎宁治疗的患者中观察到的恶性疟原虫感染可能是复发所致。每个治疗组中均有1 - 2名患者在随访期间观察到间日疟原虫血症。蒿甲醚在美拉尼西亚成年患者中似乎是安全的,并且在治疗严重或复杂恶性疟疾方面可能与静脉注射奎宁一样有效。