Suppr超能文献

胸段食管穿孔:十年经验总结

Thoracic esophageal perforations: a decade of experience.

作者信息

Port Jeffrey L, Kent Michael S, Korst Robert J, Bacchetta Matthew, Altorki Nasser K

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York 10021, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Apr;75(4):1071-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04650-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Perforation of the thoracic esophagus is a formidable challenge. Treatment and outcome are largely determined by the time to presentation. We reviewed our experience with esophageal perforations to determine the overall mortality and whether the time to presentation should influence management strategy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients treated for perforation of the thoracic esophagus from 1990 to 2001. There were 26 patients (14 men and 12 women; median age, 62 years; range, 36 to 89 years). Fourteen patients presented within 24 hours (early), and 12 patients presented after 24 hours (delayed). Nine of the 12 patients in the delayed group presented after 72 hours. The causes of the perforations were as follows: instrumentation (19 patients), Boerhaave's syndrome (2 patients), intraoperative injury (1 patient), and other (4 patients). In the early group, 3 patients were treated conservatively, 10 patients underwent primary repair, and 1 patient required esophagectomy for carcinoma. In the delayed group, 3 patients were treated conservatively, 6 underwent successful repair of the perforation, 1 had a T-tube placement through the perforation and eventually required an esophagectomy, and 2 had an esophagectomy as primary surgical treatment.

RESULTS

Hospital mortality was 3.8% (1 of 26) and morbidity was 38% (10 of 26). Persistent leaks occurred in 3 patients, 2 after primary repair and 1 after T-tube drainage. All patients selected for conservative management successfully healed their perforation.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary repair can be carried out in most cases of thoracic esophageal perforation regardless of time to presentation, with a low mortality rate. A small but carefully selected group of patients may be treated successfully without operation. Esophagectomy should be reserved for patients with carcinoma or extensive necrosis of the esophagus.

摘要

背景

胸段食管穿孔是一项严峻的挑战。治疗方法和预后很大程度上取决于就诊时间。我们回顾了我们治疗食管穿孔的经验,以确定总体死亡率以及就诊时间是否应影响治疗策略。

方法

对1990年至2001年期间所有接受胸段食管穿孔治疗的患者进行回顾性病历审查。共有26例患者(14例男性和12例女性;中位年龄62岁;范围36至89岁)。14例患者在24小时内就诊(早期),12例患者在24小时后就诊(延迟)。延迟组的12例患者中有9例在72小时后就诊。穿孔原因如下:器械操作(19例患者)、博雷哈夫综合征(2例患者)、术中损伤(1例患者)和其他(4例患者)。早期组中,3例患者接受保守治疗,10例患者接受一期修复,1例患者因癌症需要行食管切除术。延迟组中,3例患者接受保守治疗,6例患者成功修复穿孔,1例患者通过穿孔放置T形管,最终需要行食管切除术,2例患者将食管切除术作为主要手术治疗。

结果

医院死亡率为3.8%(26例中的1例),发病率为38%(26例中的10例)。3例患者出现持续渗漏,2例在一期修复后,1例在T形管引流后。所有选择保守治疗的患者穿孔均成功愈合。

结论

无论就诊时间如何,大多数胸段食管穿孔病例均可进行一期修复,死亡率较低。一小部分经过精心挑选的患者可以不通过手术而成功治疗。食管切除术应保留给患有癌症或食管广泛坏死的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验