Suppr超能文献

单次呼吸肺弥散量的测量变异性。

Measurement variability in single-breath diffusing capacity of the lung.

作者信息

Punjabi Naresh M, Shade David, Patel Anshul M, Wise Robert A

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 2003 Apr;123(4):1082-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.4.1082.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The single-breath diffusing capacity of the lung (DLCO) is a commonly performed pulmonary function test. The current American Thoracic Society (ATS) recommendations for reproducibility of DLCO measurements suggest that two measurements for the DLCO agree within 10% or 3 mL/min/mm Hg of the average value. The European Respiratory Society (ERS) recommends that two measurements should agree within 10%. The objectives of the present study were to examine whether the current reproducibility criteria were met in a general pulmonary function laboratory and to determine whether alternative criteria might be appropriate.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

University-based pulmonary function laboratory.

PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS

Patients referred for spirometry, helium lung volumes, and DLCO measurement.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

In a sample of 6,193 patients referred for clinical testing, 98.3% had two DLCO values that fulfilled the current ATS criteria for reproducibility. The coefficient of variation (CV) and the percentage difference between two repeat measurements were inversely associated with the baseline DLCO and the FEV(1). As the baseline DLCO (percentage of predicted) or FEV(1) (percentage of predicted) decreased, there was an increase in the CV and the percentage difference. In contrast, the absolute difference between repeat measurements was relatively stable irrespective of the baseline DLCO or FEV(1) values. Other patient factors, such as gender and race, were not associated with measurement variability. Using an absolute difference of 2 to 2.5 mL/min/mm Hg between two DLCO measurements as alternative criteria for reproducibility, 91.5% and 95.8% of the patient sample fulfilled these criteria, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Reproducibility of the DLCO measurement is generally much better than current standards allow. Future standards should consider an absolute difference rather than a percentage difference criterion for DLCO reproducibility.

摘要

研究目的

肺单次呼吸弥散量(DLCO)是一项常用的肺功能检查。美国胸科学会(ATS)目前关于DLCO测量重复性的建议表明,两次DLCO测量值与平均值的差异应在10%以内或3 mL/min/mm Hg以内。欧洲呼吸学会(ERS)建议两次测量值的差异应在10%以内。本研究的目的是检验在一个普通肺功能实验室中当前的重复性标准是否得到满足,并确定替代标准是否合适。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

大学附属医院肺功能实验室。

患者或参与者

因进行肺量计、氦气肺容积和DLCO测量而转诊的患者。

干预措施

无。

测量与结果

在6193例转诊进行临床检查的患者样本中,98.3%的患者两次DLCO值符合当前ATS的重复性标准。变异系数(CV)以及两次重复测量之间的百分比差异与基线DLCO和第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁)呈负相关。随着基线DLCO(预测值的百分比)或FEV₁(预测值的百分比)降低,CV和百分比差异增加。相比之下,无论基线DLCO或FEV₁值如何,重复测量之间的绝对差异相对稳定。其他患者因素,如性别和种族,与测量变异性无关。将两次DLCO测量之间2至2.5 mL/min/mm Hg的绝对差异作为重复性的替代标准,分别有91.5%和95.8%的患者样本符合这些标准。

结论

DLCO测量的重复性通常比当前标准所允许的要好得多。未来的标准应考虑采用绝对差异而非百分比差异标准来判定DLCO的重复性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验