Suppr超能文献

D 项生物质量控制研究结果来自一个多中心的全球性研究。

D Biologic Quality-Control Findings From a Multi-Center Global Study.

机构信息

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

TechEd Consultants, Mason, Michigan.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2023 Sep;68(9):1245-1253. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10606. Epub 2023 May 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 2017 American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D) standards specify a control rule for assessing biologic quality control (BioQC) but have limited guidance on how to establish expected values for control rule variables. This study aimed to determine expected values for D BioQC using coefficient of variation (CV) and compare that the mean ± 2 SD control rule yields the same precision as mean ± 12% of the mean.

METHODS

D BioQC data were collected from a multi-center inhaled medication study. This descriptive study spanned 42 months ending in 2018. The annual D CV was based upon 10 D values separated by at least 5 d. The root mean square CV (RMSCV) was computed for each year and Friedman test evaluated within subject annual CV changes. Ninetieth percentile values were computed for annual control rule limits/mean D.

RESULTS

Of 217 BioQCs, the study's first year had 168 subjects with fewer in subsequent years. Annual CV values from RMSCV were 5.3, 4.5, and 4.6% in years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. No change was seen in the CV for those subjects with data for all 3 years, = 24, = .07. The 90th percentile of measurements 2 SD/mean D were 15, 12.4, and 11% in years 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A D BioQC CV ≤ 6% is achievable across multiple sites, technologists, and brands of equipment. This CV value assures that measurements for control rule variables emerge from an expected range. A control rule of mean ± 2 SD appeared to yield similar results as the mean ± 12% of the mean rule reported in the 2017 ATS/ERS D standards.

摘要

背景

2017 年美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会(ATS/ERS)一氧化碳肺弥散量(D)标准指定了评估生物学质量控制(BioQC)的控制规则,但对如何确定控制规则变量的预期值的指导有限。本研究旨在使用变异系数(CV)确定 D BioQC 的预期值,并比较均值±2SD 控制规则与均值±12%均值规则的精度。

方法

从一项多中心吸入药物研究中收集 D BioQC 数据。本描述性研究跨越 2018 年结束的 42 个月。每年的 D CV 基于至少相隔 5 天的 10 个 D 值。计算了每年的均方根 CV(RMSCV),并通过 Friedman 检验评估了个体内年度 CV 变化。计算了年度控制规则限值/平均 D 的第 90 个百分位值。

结果

在 217 个 BioQC 中,第一年有 168 名受试者,随后几年的受试者较少。来自 RMSCV 的年度 CV 值分别为第 1、2 和 3 年的 5.3%、4.5%和 4.6%。对于所有 3 年都有数据的受试者,CV 没有变化, = 24, =.07。第 1、2 和 3 年的第 90 个百分位数的测量值为 2SD/平均 D 分别为 15%、12.4%和 11%。

结论

在多个站点、技术人员和设备品牌中,可以实现 D BioQC CV≤6%。该 CV 值确保了控制规则变量的测量值来自预期范围。均值±2SD 的控制规则似乎产生了与 2017 年 ATS/ERS D 标准中报告的均值±12%规则相似的结果。

相似文献

8
Reference values for pulmonary diffusing capacity for adult native Finns.成年芬兰本土人的肺弥散量参考值。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2017 Apr;77(2):135-142. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2017.1286519.

本文引用的文献

2
ARTP statement on pulmonary function testing 2020.ARTP 关于肺功能测试的声明 2020.
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Jul;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000575.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验