Tajima Atsushi, Sun Cheih-Shan, Pan I-Hung, Ishida Takafumi, Saitou Naruya, Horai Satoshi
Department of Biosystems Science, Graduate University for Advanced Studies (Sokendai), 240-0193, Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hum Genet. 2003 Jul;113(1):24-33. doi: 10.1007/s00439-003-0945-1. Epub 2003 Apr 10.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) polymorphisms in the D-loop region and the intergenic COII/tRNA(Lys) 9-bp deletion were examined in 180 individuals from all nine aboriginal Taiwanese groups: Atayal, Saisiat, Bunun, Tsou, Rukai, Paiwan, Ami, Puyuma, and Yami. A comparison of 563-bp sequences showed that there were 61 different sequence types, of which 42 types were specific to respective aboriginal groups. D-loop sequence variation and phylogenetic analysis enabled the 180 aboriginal lineages to be classified into eight monophyletic clusters (designated C1-C8). Phylogeographic analysis revealed that two (C2 and C4) of the eight clusters were new characteristic clusters of aboriginal Taiwanese and accounted for 8.3% and 13.9% of the aboriginal lineages, respectively. From the estimated coalescent times for the two unique clusters, the mtDNA lineages leading to such clusters were inferred to have been introduced into Taiwan approximately 11,000-26,000 years ago, suggesting ancient immigrations of the two mtDNA lineages. Genetic distances, based on net nucleotide diversities between populations, revealed three distinct clusters that were comprised of northern mountain (Atayal and Saisiat), southern mountain (Rukai and Paiwan), and middle mountain/east coast (Bunun, Tsou, Ami, Puyuma, and Yami) groups, respectively. Furthermore, phylogenetic analysis of 16 human populations (including six other Asian populations and one African population) confirmed that the three clusters for aboriginal Taiwanese had remained largely intact. Each of the clusters (north, south, and middle-east coast) was characterized by a high frequency of a particular lineage (C4, C2, and 9-bp deletion, respectively). This may result from random genetic drift among the aboriginal groups after a single introduction of all the mtDNA lineages into Taiwan, but another plausible explanation is that at least three genetically distinct ancestral populations have contributed to the maternal gene pool of aboriginal Taiwanese.
我们检测了台湾九个原住民群体(泰雅族、赛夏族、布农族、邹族、鲁凯族、排湾族、阿美族、卑南族和雅美族)180名个体线粒体DNA(mtDNA)控制区的多态性以及基因间隔区COII/tRNA(Lys)9碱基对缺失情况。对563碱基对序列的比较显示,共有61种不同的序列类型,其中42种类型分别为各原住民群体所特有。控制区序列变异和系统发育分析使得这180个原住民谱系被分为8个单系类群(命名为C1 - C8)。系统地理学分析表明,8个类群中的2个(C2和C4)是台湾原住民新的特征类群,分别占原住民谱系的8.3%和13.9%。根据这两个独特类群的估计溯祖时间,推断导致这些类群的mtDNA谱系大约在11,000 - 26,000年前被引入台湾,这表明这两个mtDNA谱系存在古代移民现象。基于群体间净核苷酸多样性的遗传距离揭示了三个不同的类群,分别由北部山区(泰雅族和赛夏族)、南部山区(鲁凯族和排湾族)以及中部山区/东海岸(布农族、邹族、阿美族、卑南族和雅美族)群体组成。此外,对16个人类群体(包括其他6个亚洲群体和1个非洲群体)的系统发育分析证实,台湾原住民的这三个类群在很大程度上保持完整。每个类群(北部、南部和中部 - 东海岸)都以特定谱系的高频率为特征(分别为C4、C2和9碱基对缺失)。这可能是由于所有mtDNA谱系一次性引入台湾后,原住民群体中发生了随机遗传漂变,但另一种合理的解释是,至少三个基因上不同的祖先群体为台湾原住民的母系基因库做出了贡献。