Auffarth Gerd U, Golescu Ariadne, Becker Klio A, Völcker Hans E
Department of Ophthalmology, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Ophthalmology. 2003 Apr;110(4):772-80. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01980-2.
To quantitatively evaluate and compare intraocular lenses (IOLs) with a round or sharp optic edge design for posterior capsule opacification (PCO).
Prospective comparative observational case series. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS: Photographs from 174 eyes were analyzed for PCO at the Department of Ophthalmology, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Part I: 121 eyes of 121 patients were analyzed for quantification of PCO. IOLs evaluated were Corneal ACR6 (n = 21), Alcon Acrysof (n = 20), Allergan AR40 (n = 27), Pharmacia 811 one-piece polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) IOL (n = 24), and Pharmacia 911A silicone IOL (n = 29). Mean follow-up was 14.01 +/- 2.81 months; mean patient age was 73.2 +/- 7.3 years. The morphologic PCO formation was evaluated for the entire optic and in the central 3-mm zone. Part II: In 53 eyes of 46 patients aged 73.4 +/- 10.8 years with an Alcon Acrysof IOL, PCO formation and capsulorrhexis/optic overlapping were analyzed 34.2 +/- 4 months after cataract surgery using EPCO Software.
Part I: The PCO values of the entire optic were for Corneal ACR6, 1.93 +/- 0.62; PMMA, 0.64 +/- 0.63; AR40, 0.55 +/- 0.28; Alcon Acrysof, 0.145 +/- 0.27; and 0.161 +/- 0.181 for the Pharmacia 911A IOL (P < 0.01). The PCO values of the central 3-mm zone were for Corneal ACR6, 1.64 +/- 0.96; PMMA, 0.49 +/- 0.39; AR40, 0.22 +/- 0.32; Alcon Acrysof, 0.08 +/- 0.21; and 0.06 +/- 0.11 for the Pharmacia 911A IOL (P < 0.01). Part II: Average overlapping of capsulorrhexis and Acrysof IOL optic was 40.5% +/- 12.4%. There was a significant correlation between PCO values and overlapping (r = -0.69, P < 0.001).
The sharp-edge IOL types (Alcon Acrysof and Pharmacia 911A silicone IOL) resulted in statistically significantly lower PCO values for analysis of the entire optic area and central 3-mm zone. There was no statistically significant difference in PCO values between the two sharp-edge optic IOLs. An overlapping of capsulorrhexis rim and the anterior IOL optic surface of more than 20% resulted in significantly lower PCO values with the Acrysof IOL.
定量评估和比较具有圆形或锐利光学边缘设计的人工晶状体(IOL)在后囊膜混浊(PCO)方面的情况。
前瞻性比较观察性病例系列。
参与者/材料:德国海德堡鲁普雷希特 - 卡尔斯大学眼科对174只眼的照片进行了PCO分析。
第一部分:对121例患者的121只眼进行PCO定量分析。评估的IOL有角膜ACR6(n = 21)、爱尔康Acrysof(n = 20)、眼力健AR40(n = 27)、法玛西亚811一体式聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)IOL(n = 24)以及法玛西亚911A硅胶IOL(n = 29)。平均随访时间为14.01±2.81个月;患者平均年龄为73.2±7.3岁。对整个光学部以及中央3毫米区域的形态学PCO形成情况进行评估。第二部分:对46例年龄为73.4±10.8岁、植入爱尔康Acrysof IOL的患者的53只眼,在白内障手术后34.2±4个月使用EPCO软件分析PCO形成情况以及撕囊/光学部重叠情况。
第一部分:整个光学部的PCO值,角膜ACR6为1.93±0.62;PMMA为0.64±0.63;AR40为0.55±0.28;爱尔康Acrysof为0.145±0.27;法玛西亚911A IOL为0.161±0.181(P < 0.01)。中央3毫米区域的PCO值,角膜ACR6为1.64±0.96;PMMA为0.49±0.39;AR40为0.22±0.32;爱尔康Acrysof为0.08±0.21;法玛西亚911A IOL为0.06±0.11(P < 0.01)。第二部分:撕囊与Acrysof IOL光学部的平均重叠率为40.5%±12.4%。PCO值与重叠率之间存在显著相关性(r = -0.69,P < 0.001)。
锐利边缘的IOL类型(爱尔康Acrysof和法玛西亚911A硅胶IOL)在整个光学区域和中央3毫米区域分析中导致PCO值在统计学上显著更低。两种锐利边缘光学IOL之间的PCO值无统计学显著差异。对于Acrysof IOL,撕囊边缘与IOL前光学表面重叠超过20%会导致PCO值显著更低。