Choi Youngon, Mazuka Reiko
Department of Psychology, Duke University, Box 90085, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2003 Mar;32(2):197-217. doi: 10.1023/a:1022400424874.
Korean children's ability to use prosodic phrasing in sentence comprehension was studied using two types of ambiguity. First, we examined a word-segmentation ambiguity in which placement of the phrasal boundary leads to different interpretations of a sentence. Next, we examined a syntactic ambiguity in which the same words were differently grouped into syntactic phrases by prosodic demarcation. Children aged 3 or 4 years showed that they could use prosodic information to segment utterances and to derive the meaning of ambiguous sentences when the sentences only contained a word-segmentation ambiguity. However, even 5- to 6-year-old children were not able to reliably resolve the second type of ambiguity, an ambiguity of phrasal grouping, by using prosodic information. The results demonstrate that children's difficulties in dealing with structural ambiguity are not due to their inability to use prosodic information.
我们使用两种歧义类型研究了韩国儿童在句子理解中运用韵律短语的能力。首先,我们考察了一种词切分歧义,其中短语边界的位置会导致句子有不同的解释。其次,我们考察了一种句法歧义,其中相同的单词通过韵律划分被不同地组合成句法短语。3岁或4岁的儿童表明,当句子仅包含词切分歧义时,他们能够利用韵律信息对话语进行切分并推导歧义句子的含义。然而,即使是5到6岁的儿童也无法通过使用韵律信息可靠地解决第二种歧义,即短语分组歧义。结果表明,儿童在处理结构歧义方面的困难并非由于他们无法使用韵律信息。