Wiechula Rick
The Joanna Briggs Institute, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Int J Nurs Pract. 2003 Apr;9(2):S9-17. doi: 10.1046/j.1322-7114.2003.00417.x.
The aim of this systematic review was to determine the best available evidence related to the post-harvest management of split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites. Studies included in the review were those involving patients of any age examining interventions relating to the post-harvest management of STSG donors and were intra-individual or randomized controlled trials. All studies were checked for methodological quality, and data were extracted using a data extraction tool. Many studies were combined in meta-analysis. The present report concerns studies examining moist and non-moist wound-healing dressings. Broad comparisons of moist wound-healing dressings against traditional non-moist dressings favoured moist wound-healing approaches in terms of healing rates, pain and infection. In comparing dressings within and between moist wound-healing dressing groups, the lack of studies of sufficient quality prevented determining a 'best dressing' for STSG donors. Moist wound-healing products have distinct clinical advantages over non-moist products in the management of STSG donors. There is a strong case for further head-to-head studies comparing products within the moist wound-healing group.
本系统评价的目的是确定与中厚皮片(STSG)供区收获后管理相关的最佳现有证据。纳入该评价的研究包括涉及任何年龄患者的研究,这些研究考察了与STSG供区收获后管理相关的干预措施,且为个体内或随机对照试验。所有研究均检查了方法学质量,并使用数据提取工具提取数据。许多研究被纳入荟萃分析。本报告涉及考察湿性和非湿性伤口愈合敷料的研究。在愈合率、疼痛和感染方面,湿性伤口愈合敷料与传统非湿性敷料的广泛比较显示湿性伤口愈合方法更具优势。在比较湿性伤口愈合敷料组内和组间的敷料时,由于缺乏足够质量的研究,无法确定针对STSG供区的“最佳敷料”。在STSG供区的管理中,湿性伤口愈合产品相对于非湿性产品具有明显的临床优势。很有必要进一步进行头对头研究,比较湿性伤口愈合组内的产品。