Cimen Serdar, Ozkul Vedat, Ketenci Bülent, Yurtseven Nurgül, Günay Rafet, Ketenci Banu, Gerçekoğlu Hakan, Demirtaş Murat
Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Department, Dr Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Istanbul, Turkey.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Apr;23(4):589-94. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(03)00023-x.
Widespread application of on-pump revascularization procedures is increasing due to the thought of elimination of untoward effects of cardiopulmonary circuit. Thus, whether off-pump coronary artery surgery eliminates side effects especially related to respiratory functions is still controversial. Although many previous studies have evaluated these respiratory functions, daily comparison of 12 parameters was not included in any of the studies. The aim of our prospective study was to ascertain whether off-pump coronary operation improves pulmonary functions and postoperative recovery period when compared with on-pump technique and whether early discharge of patients with off-pump surgery is the result of respiratory improvement.
Eighteen patients in each group were included: on-pump group underwent coronary revascularization with cardiopulmonary bypass and off-pump with stabilization. Respiratory function tests and arterial blood gas analyses were performed preoperatively and daily after operation function tests included forced expiratory volume (FEV) in 1s, forced vital capacity (FVC), expiratory reserve volume, vital capacity, quotient of FEV in 1s to FVC, maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV), tidal volume, and forced midexpiratory flow. Blood gas analyses included partial arterial oxygen and carbon dioxide pressure, arterial pH and hematocrit (Hct).
Preoperative pulmonary functions and arterial blood gases were not statistically significant between groups except MVV and partial arterial oxygen pressure. MVV was slightly higher in on-pump group and partial arterial oxygen pressure was slightly lower in on-pump group. During postoperative first day Hct (P=0.004) and FEV in 1s (P=0.049) values and third day partial arterial oxygen pressure (P=0.011) and Hct (P=0.011) values were lower in on-pump group. Mean extubation, duration in postoperative suit and hospital discharge times, mean blood loss were not statistically significant between groups postoperatively.
Pulmonary functions and arterial blood gases were not improved in off-pump patients when compared with on-pump patients. Patients going to be surgically revascularized should not be altered to off-pump surgery merely with the hope of improving respiratory functions with off-pump technique. As the postoperative stay times at surgical theatre and hospital is not different and the extubation times were similar, early discharge of patients with off-pump surgery cannot be related merely to better preservation of respiratory functions.
由于认为体外循环的不良影响可被消除,体外循环下血运重建手术的广泛应用正在增加。因此,非体外循环冠状动脉手术是否能消除特别是与呼吸功能相关的副作用仍存在争议。尽管许多先前的研究已经评估了这些呼吸功能,但任何一项研究都未包括对12项参数的每日比较。我们前瞻性研究的目的是确定与体外循环技术相比,非体外循环冠状动脉手术是否能改善肺功能和术后恢复期,以及非体外循环手术患者早期出院是否是呼吸功能改善的结果。
每组纳入18例患者:体外循环组在体外循环下进行冠状动脉血运重建,非体外循环组在心脏稳定下进行手术。术前及术后每日进行呼吸功能测试和动脉血气分析。呼吸功能测试包括第1秒用力呼气量(FEV)、用力肺活量(FVC)、呼气储备量、肺活量、第1秒用力呼气量与用力肺活量的比值、最大自主通气量(MVV)、潮气量和用力呼气中期流速。血气分析包括动脉血氧分压和二氧化碳分压、动脉pH值和血细胞比容(Hct)。
除MVV和动脉血氧分压外,两组术前肺功能和动脉血气无统计学差异。体外循环组MVV略高,动脉血氧分压略低。术后第1天,体外循环组的Hct(P = 0.004)和第1秒用力呼气量(P = 0.049)值以及术后第3天的动脉血氧分压(P = 0.011)和Hct(P = 0.011)值较低。术后两组间平均拔管时间、术后住院时间和出院时间、平均失血量无统计学差异。
与体外循环患者相比,非体外循环患者的肺功能和动脉血气并未改善。准备接受手术血运重建的患者不应仅仅为了希望通过非体外循环技术改善呼吸功能而改为非体外循环手术。由于术后在手术室和医院的停留时间无差异且拔管时间相似,非体外循环手术患者的早期出院不能仅仅归因于对呼吸功能的更好保护。