Holm Inger, Friis Astrid, Storheim Kjersti, Brox Jens Ivar
Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, National Hospital Orthopaedic Department, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Apr 15;28(8):828-33.
A reliability study was performed.
To evaluate the test-retest reliability of self-reported functional status and pain in chronic low back pain patients by postal questionnaires.
Evaluation tools focusing on the patients' self-reported physical function are recommended in studies on low back pain. Postal questionnaires are inexpensive and should be considered to assess long-term results. The reliability of a postal questionnaire has not been assessed in patients with chronic low back pain.
Forty-two patients with chronic low back pain (15 men, 27 women; mean age, 40 years; range, 20-61 years) agreed to participate in the study. The mean duration of symptoms was 8.9 years (range, 1-40 years). A postal questionnaire was sent to the patients twice within a 2-week interval. The questionnaire included the following items: work, back satisfaction, General Function Score (GFS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), pain, fear-avoidance beliefs, life satisfaction and pain medication.
Thirty-seven patients (88%) returned both questionnaires. Except for lumbar pain, there were no statistical differences between the answers from the two questionnaires. The intraclass coefficient values ranged from 0.70 (lumbar pain) to 0.94 (ODI). The repeatability or absolute size of measurement error was 11.9 for the ODI and 28.6 and 34.2 for lumbar and leg pain, respectively. The kappa values for work, back satisfaction, and pain medication were 0.94 and 0.61, 0.62, and 0.64, respectively. The kappa values for the separate items in the GFS ranged from 0.41 to 0.79. The correlations between ODI and the GFS, lumbar pain, life satisfaction, and back satisfaction were 0.35, -0.72, -0.76, and 0.76, respectively.
The ODI was highly reliable. The questions about work, back satisfaction, and pain medication showed good agreement. The GFS, pain intensity, fear-avoidance beliefs, and life satisfaction appeared to lack sufficient reliability to be recommended in postal questionnaires.
进行了一项可靠性研究。
通过邮寄问卷评估慢性下腰痛患者自我报告的功能状态和疼痛的重测信度。
在腰痛研究中,推荐使用关注患者自我报告身体功能的评估工具。邮寄问卷成本低廉,应考虑用于评估长期结果。尚未评估邮寄问卷在慢性下腰痛患者中的信度。
42例慢性下腰痛患者(15例男性,27例女性;平均年龄40岁;范围20 - 61岁)同意参与研究。症状平均持续时间为8.9年(范围1 - 40年)。在两周间隔内给患者邮寄两次问卷。问卷包括以下项目:工作、背部满意度、总体功能评分(GFS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、疼痛、恐惧回避信念、生活满意度和止痛药物。
37例患者(88%)返还了两份问卷。除腰痛外,两份问卷的答案之间无统计学差异。组内相关系数值范围为0.70(腰痛)至0.94(ODI)。ODI的测量误差重复性或绝对大小为11.9,腰痛和腿痛的分别为28.6和34.2。工作、背部满意度和止痛药物的kappa值分别为0.94、0.61、0.62和0.64。GFS中各单项的kappa值范围为0.41至0.79。ODI与GFS、腰痛、生活满意度和背部满意度的相关性分别为0.35、 - 0.72、 - 0.76和0.76。
ODI具有高度可靠性。关于工作、背部满意度和止痛药物的问题显示出良好的一致性。GFS、疼痛强度、恐惧回避信念和生活满意度似乎缺乏足够的可靠性,不建议在邮寄问卷中使用。