Thomas Cindy Parks, Wallack Stanley S, Lee Sue, Ritter Grant A
Schneider Institute for Health Policy, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Jul-Dec;Suppl Web Exclusives:W408-19. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w2.408.
We examined 2001 prescription drug claims for a range of employer-based retiree plans administered by a national pharmacy benefit management firm, to understand how use and spending differ with various cost-sharing approaches and other drug use management techniques among the elderly. In these plans, most of which had generous benefits and substantial use of mail order, more aggressive cost-sharing requirements combined with other management strategies were associated with greater member cost sharing, a shift to less costly medications (generic and mail order), and lower total prescription drug spending. Although we did not find lower rates of use in plans with aggressive cost sharing, this may be attributable in part to their higher drug use associated with mail-order incentives.
我们研究了一家全国性药房福利管理公司管理的一系列基于雇主的退休人员计划的2001份处方药理赔申请,以了解老年人在不同成本分摊方法和其他药物使用管理技术下,药物使用和支出情况有何不同。在这些计划中,大多数都有慷慨的福利且大量使用邮购服务,更激进的成本分摊要求与其他管理策略相结合,会导致会员承担更高的成本分摊,转向成本更低的药物(非专利药和邮购药),以及降低处方药总支出。尽管我们没有发现在激进成本分摊计划中药物使用率较低的情况,但这可能部分归因于与邮购激励相关的更高药物使用量。