Slavikova Monika, Schmeisser Hana, Kontsekova Eva, Mateicka Frantisek, Borecky Ladislav, Kontsek Peter
Institute of Virology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 842 45 Bratislava, Slovakia.
J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2003 Mar;23(3):143-7. doi: 10.1089/107999003321532475.
Autoantibodies against interferon (IFN) can be found in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, detailed information about the occurrence of type-specific antihuman IFN antibodies is not available. In this study, we investigated the incidence of autoantibodies specifically recognizing various type I IFNs (alpha1, alpha2, beta, omega) and type II IFN (gamma). Sera from 100 SLE patients were screened for the presence of IFN-binding antibodies by ELISA, using various types of recombinant IFNs as antigen. On the whole, autoantibodies against type I or type II or both IFNs were detected in 45% (45 of 100) of the serum samples investigated. More than half (56%) of the positive samples (25 of 45) contained antibodies specific only for type I IFNs, and 36% of positive sera (16 of 45) had autoantibodies only against type II IFN. Antibodies against both type I and type II IFNs were detected in 8% (4 of 45) of the positive samples. Among autoantibodies to type I IFNs, the most abundant were those against the type IFN-omega (15%) and the subtype IFN-alpha2 (11%). Autoantibodies binding subtype IFN-alpha1 and type IFN-beta were detected at a relatively lower incidence of about 3%-4%. The highest occurrence (20%) showed autoantibodies to the proinflammatory cytokine, IFN-gamma. We did not find any correlation between the production of autoantibodies against particular IFN species and an antibody response to other IFN species. We further observed that 84% (38 of 45) of the positive sera bound only one IFN species, and 13% (6 of 45) of positive samples contained antibodies against two IFN species of five different combinations (alpha1/beta, alpha1/omega, alpha2/omega, alpha2/gamma, omega/gamma). One sample uniquely showed reactivity with three IFN species (alpha2/omega/gamma). Our findings suggest that formation of autoantibodies could reflect humoral immune responses to increased spontaneous production of the respective IFN species in SLE patients.
系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者体内可检测到抗干扰素(IFN)自身抗体。然而,关于特异性抗人IFN抗体出现情况的详细信息尚不可知。在本研究中,我们调查了特异性识别各种I型IFN(α1、α2、β、ω)和II型IFN(γ)的自身抗体的发生率。采用多种重组IFN作为抗原,通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法,对100例SLE患者的血清进行IFN结合抗体筛查。总体而言,在所检测的血清样本中,45%(100例中的45例)检测到抗I型或II型或两种IFN的自身抗体。超过半数(56%)的阳性样本(45例中的25例)仅含有针对I型IFN的特异性抗体,36%的阳性血清(45例中的16例)仅具有抗II型IFN的自身抗体。8%(45例中的4例)的阳性样本中检测到同时针对I型和II型IFN的抗体。在针对I型IFN的自身抗体中,最常见的是抗ω型IFN(15%)和α2亚型IFN(11%)。检测到与α1亚型IFN和β型IFN结合的自身抗体的发生率相对较低,约为3%-4%。针对促炎细胞因子IFN-γ的自身抗体出现率最高(20%)。我们未发现针对特定IFN种类的自身抗体产生与对其他IFN种类的抗体反应之间存在任何关联。我们进一步观察到,84%(45例中的38例)的阳性血清仅结合一种IFN种类,13%(45例中的6例)的阳性样本含有针对五种不同组合(α1/β、α1/ω、α2/ω、α2/γ、ω/γ)中的两种IFN种类的抗体。有一个样本独特地显示出与三种IFN种类(α2/ω/γ)发生反应。我们的研究结果表明,自身抗体的形成可能反映了SLE患者对相应IFN种类自发产生增加的体液免疫反应。