Muller Monique E, Webber Colin E, Bouxsein Mary L
Department of Nuclear Medicine Hamilton Health Sciences McMaster Site, HSC-1P10, L8N 3Z5, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Osteoporos Int. 2003 Jun;14(4):345-52. doi: 10.1007/s00198-003-1380-9. Epub 2003 Apr 25.
The distal radius is an important site for the early detection of patients at risk for fracture. Since measuring bone strength in vivo is not possible, we evaluated which bone assessment method of the forearm would best predict failure load of the distal radius and computed a factor of risk for wrist fracture (Phi wrist). Thirty-eight cadaveric forearm specimens were measured by five different techniques to assess bone density, bone mineral content, geometry and trabecular structure at the distal forearm. The bone assessment techniques included dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the radius, peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) of the 4% and 20% distal sites of the radius, DXA of the phalanges, digital X-ray radiogrammetry of the forearm (DXR-BMD), and quantitative ultrasound of the radius. The failure load of each excised radius was determined by simulating a fall on an outstretched hand. The pQCT measurements of polar stress-strain index and cortical content explained the greatest portion of variance in failure load (r2=0.82-0.85). Bone mineral content measures were generally better predictors of failure load (r2=0.53-0.85) than the corresponding volumetric or areal bone mineral density values (r2=0.22-0.69) measured by either pQCT or DXA. Multiple regression analysis showed that the addition of a bone geometry measure improved the ability of a bone density measure alone to predict failure load. There was high variability in the ability of different techniques and different variables within a given technique to predict failure load. Estimates of the factor of risk for wrist fracture (Phi wrist) revealed that the women in this study would have been likely to fracture their distal radius upon falling from a standing height (Phi wrist= 1.04), whereas the men would have likely withstood the impact without fracturing their wrist (Phi wrist= 0.79).
桡骨远端是早期发现骨折风险患者的重要部位。由于无法在体内测量骨强度,我们评估了哪种前臂骨评估方法能最佳预测桡骨远端的破坏载荷,并计算了腕部骨折风险因子(Phi腕)。通过五种不同技术对38个尸体前臂标本进行测量,以评估前臂远端的骨密度、骨矿物质含量、几何形状和小梁结构。骨评估技术包括桡骨双能X线吸收法(DXA)、桡骨远端4%和20%部位的外周定量计算机断层扫描(pQCT)、指骨DXA、前臂数字X线摄影测量法(DXR-BMD)以及桡骨定量超声检查。通过模拟伸手着地摔倒来确定每个切除桡骨的破坏载荷。极向应力应变指数和皮质含量的pQCT测量解释了破坏载荷方差的最大部分(r2 = 0.82 - 0.85)。骨矿物质含量测量通常比通过pQCT或DXA测量的相应体积或面积骨矿物质密度值(r2 = 0.22 - 0.69)更能预测破坏载荷(r2 = 0.53 - 0.85)。多元回归分析表明,添加骨几何测量值可提高单独骨密度测量值预测破坏载荷的能力。不同技术以及给定技术内不同变量预测破坏载荷的能力存在很大差异。腕部骨折风险因子(Phi腕)的估计表明,本研究中的女性从站立高度跌倒时很可能桡骨远端骨折(Phi腕 = 1.04),而男性可能承受住冲击而不发生腕部骨折(Phi腕 = 0.79)。