Suppr超能文献

通过三种不同的间接酶联免疫吸附测定法,检测断奶仔猪经猪疥螨接触感染后以及用抗寄生虫药治疗后的血清中的抗体。

Detection of antibodies in sera of weaned pigs after contact infection with Sarcoptes scabiei var. suis and after treatment with an antiparasitic agent by three different indirect ELISAs.

作者信息

Kessler E, Matthes H-F, Schein E, Wendt M

机构信息

Extension Center for Epidemiology, Buescheler Strasse 9, D-49456 Bakum, Germany.

出版信息

Vet Parasitol. 2003 May 15;114(1):63-73. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(03)00098-0.

Abstract

Three commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were compared for the detection of antibodies to Sarcoptes scabiei var. suis using experimental sera of six 8-week-old pigs after contact infection with Sarcoptes scabiei var. suis. Six non-infected pigs were monitored as a control group. Blood sera were taken once a week from all animals. After successful infection the pigs were treated with an antiparasitic agent (12 weeks post infection (p.i.)) and the antibody titres were monitored until they were negative. The antibody levels of the experimental pigs reached the cut-off level 5 weeks after introduction of an infected animal to the group and were positive by both the Sarcoptes-ELISA 2001 PIG and the Acar-Test P-ELISA. Four weeks after treatment mean results showed optical densities (% OD) below the cut-off level in the Sarcoptes-ELISA 2001 and 8 weeks after treatment in the Acar-Test P-ELISA. In the Chekit Sarcoptest pigs had elevated antibody levels in comparison to control animals, but ODs remained below the given cut-off level at all times. In a second examination with Chekit Sarcoptest (different lot) and at a lower cut-off level, the sera of most of the piglets tested positive. Eight weeks after treatment, four from six pigs still had positive OD values. Therefore this investigation showed a higher sensitivity for the Sarcoptes-ELISA 2001 and the Acar-Test P-ELISA than for the Chekit Sarcoptest. Different test sensitivities must be considered when serologic methods are used for the diagnosis of swine sarcoptic mange, especially for monitoring and controlling eradication programs.

摘要

比较了三种商业酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)方法,用于检测经猪疥螨变种接触感染后的6只8周龄仔猪的实验血清中针对猪疥螨变种的抗体。监测6只未感染的猪作为对照组。每周从所有动物采集一次血清。成功感染后,用抗寄生虫剂对猪进行治疗(感染后12周),并监测抗体滴度直至转阴。将感染动物引入该组后5周,实验猪的抗体水平达到临界值,且猪疥螨ELISA 2001猪用试剂盒和Acar-Test P-ELISA检测均呈阳性。治疗4周后,猪疥螨ELISA 2001的平均结果显示光密度(%OD)低于临界值;治疗8周后,Acar-Test P-ELISA的光密度低于临界值。与对照动物相比,使用Chekit疥螨检测试剂盒检测的猪抗体水平升高,但OD值始终低于给定的临界值。在使用Chekit疥螨检测试剂盒(不同批次)且临界值较低的第二次检测中,大多数仔猪的血清检测呈阳性。治疗8周后,6只猪中有4只的OD值仍为阳性。因此,本研究表明,猪疥螨ELISA 2001和Acar-Test P-ELISA的敏感性高于Chekit疥螨检测试剂盒。在使用血清学方法诊断猪疥螨病时,尤其是监测和控制根除计划时,必须考虑不同检测方法的敏感性差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验