Skates Steven J, Menon Usha, MacDonald Nicola, Rosenthal Adam N, Oram David H, Knapp Robert C, Jacobs Ian J
Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2003 May 15;21(10 Suppl):206s-210s. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.02.955.
Previous studies of CA-125 levels from screening trials for ovarian cancer have indicated that serial CA-125 levels may identify cases better than a fixed CA-125 cutoff. We conducted a study to assess the screening performance of the risk of ovarian cancer calculation based on serial CA-125 levels from prospectively collected serum samples compared with a fixed CA-125 cutoff.
The calculation was applied to data from a prospective trial of screening for ovarian cancer involving 22,000 postmenopausal women older than 45 years. The analysis was performed using 33,621 CA-125 results from 9,233 women for whom two or more serial samples were available. All serum samples from the patients with ovarian cancer were obtained before clinical detection. Sensitivity and specificity levels for preclinical detection of index cancers were calculated for various cutoffs for the risk and a single CA-125 measurement, and receiver operator curves were constructed.
The risk calculation significantly improved the area under the curve from 84% to 93% compared with a fixed cutoff for CA-125 (P =.01). For a target specificity of 98%, the risk achieved a sensitivity of 86% for preclinical detection of ovarian cancer, whereas CA-125 achieved a sensitivity of 62%. The estimates of performance are unbiased, because the risk calculation was derived independent of the data from this trial.
These results provide the first evidence that preclinical detection of ovarian cancer using serial CA-125 levels interpreted with the risk calculation significantly improves screening performance compared with a fixed cutoff for CA-125. The results justify the incorporation of the risk calculation in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
既往卵巢癌筛查试验中对CA-125水平的研究表明,连续的CA-125水平可能比固定的CA-125临界值能更好地识别病例。我们开展了一项研究,以评估基于前瞻性收集的血清样本中连续CA-125水平计算的卵巢癌风险与固定CA-125临界值相比的筛查性能。
该计算方法应用于一项涉及22000名45岁以上绝经后女性的卵巢癌前瞻性筛查试验数据。分析使用了来自9233名女性的33621份CA-125检测结果,这些女性有两份或更多份连续样本。所有卵巢癌患者的血清样本均在临床检测前采集。针对风险的各种临界值和单次CA-125测量,计算了指数癌临床前检测的敏感性和特异性水平,并绘制了受试者操作特征曲线。
与CA-125的固定临界值相比,风险计算显著将曲线下面积从84%提高到93%(P = 0.01)。对于98%的目标特异性,该风险对卵巢癌临床前检测的敏感性达到86%,而CA-125的敏感性为62%。性能估计是无偏的,因为风险计算是独立于该试验数据得出的。
这些结果首次证明,与CA-125的固定临界值相比,使用连续CA-125水平并结合风险计算进行卵巢癌临床前检测可显著提高筛查性能。这些结果证明将风险计算纳入一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验是合理的。