Little C L, Omotoye R, Mitchell R T
Environmental Surveillance Unit, Public Health Laboratory Service, London, UK.
Int J Environ Health Res. 2003 Mar;13(1):31-42. doi: 10.1080/0960312021000063331.
A microbiological study of ready-to-eat foods with added spices or spice ingredients was undertaken to identify any risk factors in the production, storage and display of this product and to establish their effect on microbiological quality. Examination of 1946 ready-to-eat foods from sandwich bars, cafés, public houses, restaurants, specialist sandwich producers, bakers, delicatessens, market stalls and mobile vendors found that 1291 (66%) were of satisfactory/acceptable microbiological quality, 609 (32%) were of unsatisfactory quality, and 46 (2%) were of unacceptable quality. Unacceptable results were due to high levels of B. cereus and/or other Bacillus spp. (>/=10(5) cfu g(-1)). Unsatisfactory results were mostly due to high Aerobic Colony Counts (up to >/=10(7) cfu g(-1)), Enterobacteriaceae (>/=10(4) cfu g(-1)), Escherichia coli (>/=10(2) cfu g(-1)), and Bacillus spp (>/=10(4) cfu g(-1)). Examination of 750 spices and spice ingredients revealed that B. cereus were present in 142 (19%) samples, other Bacillus spp. in 399 (53%) samples, and Salmonella spp. (S. enteritidis PT 11) in one (<1%) sample. Approximately a third (222) of spice and spice ingredients examined contained high counts (>/=10(4) cfu g(-1)) of B. cereus and/or other Bacillus spp., and appeared to be associated with the corresponding ready-to-eat foods containing similar high counts of these organisms (P<0.0001). Acceptable microbiological quality of ready-to-eat foods to which spices or spice ingredients have been added was associated with premises that had management food hygiene training and hazard analysis in place. Poor microbiological quality was associated with preparation on the premises, premises type, little or no confidence in the food business management of food hygiene, and small premises as indicated by local authority inspectors' confidence in management and consumer at risk scores.
开展了一项对添加了香料或香料成分的即食食品的微生物学研究,以确定该产品在生产、储存和展示过程中的任何风险因素,并确定它们对微生物质量的影响。对来自三明治店、咖啡馆、酒吧、餐馆、专业三明治生产商、面包店、熟食店、市场摊位和流动摊贩的1946份即食食品进行检测发现,1291份(66%)的微生物质量令人满意/可接受,609份(32%)质量不令人满意,46份(2%)质量不可接受。不可接受的结果是由于蜡样芽孢杆菌和/或其他芽孢杆菌属水平过高(≥10⁵ cfu g⁻¹)。不令人满意的结果主要是由于需氧菌落数过高(高达≥10⁷ cfu g⁻¹)、肠杆菌科(≥10⁴ cfu g⁻¹)、大肠杆菌(≥10² cfu g⁻¹)和芽孢杆菌属(≥10⁴ cfu g⁻¹)。对750种香料和香料成分的检测显示,142份(19%)样品中存在蜡样芽孢杆菌,399份(53%)样品中存在其他芽孢杆菌属,1份(<1%)样品中存在沙门氏菌属(肠炎沙门氏菌PT11)。大约三分之一(222份)检测的香料和香料成分含有高数量(≥10⁴ cfu g⁻¹)的蜡样芽孢杆菌和/或其他芽孢杆菌属,并且似乎与含有类似高数量这些微生物的相应即食食品有关(P<0.0001)。添加了香料或香料成分的即食食品的可接受微生物质量与具备管理食品卫生培训和危害分析的场所相关。微生物质量差与现场制备、场所类型、对食品企业食品卫生管理几乎没有信心或完全没有信心以及地方当局检查员对管理的信心和消费者风险评分所表明的小场所相关。