• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Distinguishing semantic control and phonological control and their role in aphasic deficits: A task switching investigation.区分语义控制和语音控制及其在失语症缺陷中的作用:一项任务转换研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Aug 13;173:108302. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108302. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
2
Phonological and semantic processing during comprehension in Wernicke's aphasia: An N400 and Phonological Mapping Negativity Study.韦尼克失语症患者语言理解过程中的语音和语义加工:一项N400与语音映射负波研究
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jun;100:144-154. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.012. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
3
Dissociable components of phonological and lexical-semantic short-term memory and their relation to impaired word production in aphasia.语音和词汇语义短期记忆的可分离成分及其与失语症患者单词生成障碍的关系。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2013;30(7-8):544-63. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2014.884058. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
4
Semantic network activation facilitates oral word reading in chronic aphasia.语义网络激活有助于慢性失语症患者的口语阅读。
Brain Lang. 2022 Oct;233:105164. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105164. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
5
Triangulation of language-cognitive impairments, naming errors and their neural bases post-stroke.脑卒中后语言认知障碍、命名错误及其神经基础的三角剖分。
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Nov 6;17:465-473. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.10.037. eCollection 2018.
6
Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Connectivity Between Semantic and Phonological Regions of Interest May Inform Language Targets in Aphasia.静息态功能磁共振成像中语义和语音感兴趣区域之间的连接性可能为失语症的语言目标提供信息。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Sep 15;63(9):3051-3067. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00117. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
7
Reduced short-term memory span in aphasia and susceptibility to interference: contribution of material-specific maintenance deficits.失语症患者短期记忆跨度减小且易受干扰:与材料特异性维持缺陷有关。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Mar;48(4):909-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.010. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
8
What Does a Cue Do? Comparing Phonological and Semantic Cues for Picture Naming in Aphasia.线索有什么作用?比较失语症中图片命名的语音和语义线索
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Mar 15;61(3):658-674. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-17-0214.
9
Unification of behavioural, computational and neural accounts of word production errors in post-stroke aphasia.将行为、计算和神经方法对中风后失语症中单词产生错误的解释统一起来。
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Mar 27;18:952-962. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.03.031. eCollection 2018.
10
Linguistic deficits in the acute phase of stroke.中风急性期的语言缺陷。
J Neurol. 2003 Aug;250(8):977-82. doi: 10.1007/s00415-003-1134-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Brain Activation in Response to Literature-Related Activities.响应与文学相关活动时的大脑激活情况。
Psychiatry Investig. 2025 May;22(5):574-582. doi: 10.30773/pi.2025.0035. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
Unveiling Cognitive Interference: fNIRS Insights Into Poststroke Aphasia During Stroop Tasks.揭示认知干扰:功能近红外光谱技术对卒中后失语症患者在Stroop任务中的见解
Neural Plast. 2025 Mar 31;2025:1456201. doi: 10.1155/np/1456201. eCollection 2025.
3
Evidence from aphasia suggests a bidirectional relationship between inner speech and executive function.失语症的证据表明,内言语和执行功能之间存在双向关系。
Neuropsychologia. 2024 Nov 5;204:108997. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108997. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
4
The Role of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in the Production and Comprehension of Phonologically and Semantically Related Words.背外侧前额叶皮层在语音和语义相关词汇的生成与理解中的作用。
Brain Sci. 2023 Jul 22;13(7):1113. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13071113.
5
Listening to Yourself and Watching Your Tongue: Distinct Abilities and Brain Regions for Monitoring Semantic and Phonological Speech Errors.倾听自我与观察舌尖:监控语义和语音言语错误的独特能力与大脑区域。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2023 Jul 1;35(7):1169-1194. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02000.
6
Resisting Visual, Phonological, and Semantic Interference - Same or Different Processes? A Focused Mini-Review.抵抗视觉、语音和语义干扰——相同还是不同的过程?一篇聚焦的小型综述。
Psychol Belg. 2023 Apr 11;62(1):44-63. doi: 10.5334/pb.1184. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
A case-study of language-specific executive disorder.语言特异性执行障碍病例研究。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2021 Feb-Mar;38(2):125-137. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2021.1941828. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
2
Striatum and language processing: Where do we stand?纹状体与语言处理:我们处于什么位置?
Cognition. 2021 Aug;213:104785. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104785. Epub 2021 May 29.
3
How Abstract (Non-embodied) Linguistic Representations Augment Cognitive Control.抽象(非具身)语言表征如何增强认知控制。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 15;11:1597. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01597. eCollection 2020.
4
Evaluating the distinction between semantic knowledge and semantic access: Evidence from semantic dementia and comprehension-impaired stroke aphasia.评估语义知识和语义访问之间的区别:来自语义痴呆和理解障碍性中风失语症的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Aug;27(4):607-639. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01706-6.
5
Inner Speech in Aphasia: Current Evidence, Clinical Implications, and Future Directions.失语症中的内部言语:当前证据、临床意义和未来方向。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Feb 21;29(1S):560-573. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-CAC48-18-0212. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
6
Assessing and mapping language, attention and executive multidimensional deficits in stroke aphasia.评估和绘制脑卒中失语症的语言、注意力和执行功能多维缺陷图。
Brain. 2019 Oct 1;142(10):3202-3216. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz258.
7
Speech Perception: Phonological Neighborhood Effects on Word Recognition Persist Despite Semantic Sentence Context.言语感知:尽管有语义句子语境,但语音近邻效应对单词识别的影响仍然存在。
Percept Mot Skills. 2019 Dec;126(6):1047-1057. doi: 10.1177/0031512519870032. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
8
Semantic Processing in Bilingual Aphasia: Evidence of Language Dependency.双语失语症中的语义加工:语言依赖性证据
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jun 14;13:205. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00205. eCollection 2019.
9
The Subjective Experience of Inner Speech in Aphasia Is a Meaningful Reflection of Lexical Retrieval.失语症患者的内言语主观体验是词汇提取的有意义反映。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Jan 30;62(1):106-122. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0222.
10
Assessment of linguistic and verbal short-term memory components of language abilities in aphasia.失语症语言能力的语言和言语短期记忆成分评估
J Neurolinguistics. 2018 Nov;48:199-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.02.006.

区分语义控制和语音控制及其在失语症缺陷中的作用:一项任务转换研究。

Distinguishing semantic control and phonological control and their role in aphasic deficits: A task switching investigation.

机构信息

Center for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Neurology Department, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.

Center for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Neurology Department, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA; Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2022 Aug 13;173:108302. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108302. Epub 2022 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108302
PMID:35718138
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9308992/
Abstract

People use cognitive control across many contexts in daily life, yet it remains unclear how cognitive control is used in contexts involving language. Distinguishing language-specific cognitive control components may be critical to understanding aphasia, which can co-occur with cognitive control deficits. For example, deficits in control of semantic representations (i.e., semantic control), are thought to contribute to semantic deficits in aphasia. Conversely, little is known about control of phonological representations (i.e., phonological control) in aphasia. We developed a switching task to investigate semantic and phonological control in 32 left hemisphere stroke survivors with aphasia and 37 matched controls. We found that phonological and semantic control were related, but dissociate in the presence of switching demands. People with aphasia exhibited group-wise impairment at phonological control, although individual impairments were subtle except in one case. Several individuals with aphasia exhibited frank semantic control impairments, and these individuals had relative deficits on other semantic tasks. The present findings distinguish semantic control from phonological control, and confirm that semantic control impairments contribute to semantic deficits in aphasia.

摘要

人们在日常生活中会在许多情境中使用认知控制,但对于语言情境中如何使用认知控制仍不清楚。区分特定于语言的认知控制成分对于理解失语症可能至关重要,因为失语症可能与认知控制缺陷同时发生。例如,控制语义表示(即语义控制)的缺陷被认为导致了失语症中的语义缺陷。相反,对于失语症中的语音表示(即语音控制)的控制知之甚少。我们开发了一种转换任务,以调查 32 名左半球中风后失语症患者和 37 名匹配对照组的语义和语音控制。我们发现,语音控制和语义控制是相关的,但在转换需求存在时会分离。失语症患者表现出语音控制的组间损伤,尽管除了一个病例外,个体损伤很细微。一些失语症患者表现出明显的语义控制损伤,并且这些患者在其他语义任务上存在相对缺陷。目前的发现将语义控制与语音控制区分开来,并证实语义控制损伤导致了失语症中的语义缺陷。