Brodaty Henry, Green Alisa, Koschera Annette
School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 May;51(5):657-64. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0579.2003.00210.x.
To review published reports of interventions for caregivers (CGs) of persons with dementia, excluding respite care, and provide recommendations to clinicians.
Meta-analytical review. Electronic databases and key articles were searched for controlled trials, preferably randomized, published in English from 1985 to 2001 inclusive. Thirty studies were located and scored according to set criteria, and the interventions' research quality and clinical significance were judged.
Home or noninstitutional environment.
Informal CGs-persons providing unpaid care at home or in a noninstitutional setting.
The primary measures were psychological morbidity and burden. Other varied outcome measures such as CG coping skills and social support were combined with measures of psychological distress and burden to form a main outcome measure.
The quality of research increased over the 17 years. Results from 30 studies (34 interventions) indicated, at most-current follow-up, significant benefits in caregiver psychological distress (random effect size (ES) = 0.31; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.13-0.50), caregiver knowledge (ES = 0.51; CI = 0.05-0.98), any main caregiver outcome measure (ES = 0.32; CI = 0.15-0.48), and patient mood (ES = 0.68; CI = 0.30-1.06), but not caregiver burden (ES = 0.09; CI = -0.09-0.26). There was considerable variability in outcome, partly because of differences in methodology and intervention technique. Elements of successful interventions could be identified. Success was more likely if, in addition to CGs, patients were involved. Four of seven studies indicated delayed nursing home admission.
Some CG interventions can reduce CG psychological morbidity and help people with dementia stay at home longer. Programs that involve the patients and their families and are more intensive and modified to CGs' needs may be more successful. Future research should try to improve clinicians' abilities to prescribe interventions.
回顾已发表的针对痴呆症患者照料者(CGs)的干预措施报告(不包括临时护理),并为临床医生提供建议。
荟萃分析综述。检索电子数据库和关键文章,查找1985年至2001年(含)以英文发表的对照试验,最好是随机试验。共找到30项研究,并根据既定标准进行评分,同时对干预措施的研究质量和临床意义进行判断。
家庭或非机构环境。
非正式照料者——在家庭或非机构环境中提供无偿护理的人员。
主要测量指标为心理疾病和负担。其他各种结果指标,如照料者应对技能和社会支持,与心理困扰和负担指标相结合,形成主要结果指标。
在这17年中,研究质量有所提高。30项研究(34项干预措施)的结果表明,在最近一次随访时,照料者心理困扰(随机效应量(ES)=0.31;95%置信区间(CI)=0.13 - 0.50)、照料者知识(ES = 0.51;CI = 0.05 - 0.98)、任何主要照料者结果指标(ES = 0.32;CI = 0.15 - 0.48)以及患者情绪(ES = 0.68;CI = 0.30 - 1.06)均有显著改善,但照料者负担(ES = 0.09;CI = -0.09 - 0.26)无显著变化。结果存在相当大的差异,部分原因是方法和干预技术的不同。可以确定成功干预措施的要素。如果除了照料者之外,患者也参与其中,成功的可能性更大。七项研究中有四项表明可延迟养老院入住。
一些针对照料者的干预措施可以降低照料者的心理疾病发病率,并帮助痴呆症患者在家中停留更长时间。涉及患者及其家庭且更密集并根据照料者需求进行调整的项目可能会更成功。未来的研究应努力提高临床医生开具干预措施的能力。