Suppr超能文献

关于健康集中指数分解的一则注释。

A note on the decomposition of the health concentration index.

作者信息

Clarke Philip M, Gerdtham Ulf-G, Connelly Luke B

机构信息

Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2003 Jun;12(6):511-6. doi: 10.1002/hec.767.

Abstract

In recent work, the concentration index has been widely used as a measure of income-related health inequality. The purpose of this note is to illustrate two different methods for decomposing the overall health concentration index using data collected from a Short Form (SF-36) survey of the general Australian population conducted in 1995. For simplicity, we focus on the physical functioning scale of the SF-36. Firstly we examine decomposition 'by component' by separating the concentration index for the physical functioning scale into the ten items on which it is based. The results show that the items contribute differently to the overall inequality measure, i.e. two of the items contributed 13% and 5%, respectively, to the overall measure. Second, to illustrate the 'by subgroup' method we decompose the concentration index by employment status. This involves separating the population into two groups: individuals currently in employment; and individuals not currently employed. We find that the inequality between these groups is about five times greater than the inequality within each group. These methods provide insights into the nature of inequality that can be used to inform policy design to reduce income related health inequalities.

摘要

在近期的研究中,集中指数已被广泛用作衡量与收入相关的健康不平等程度的指标。本说明的目的是说明两种不同的方法,用于使用1995年对澳大利亚普通人群进行的简短形式(SF-36)调查收集的数据,对总体健康集中指数进行分解。为简单起见,我们重点关注SF-36的身体功能量表。首先,我们通过将身体功能量表的集中指数分解为其所基于的十个项目来研究“按组成部分”分解。结果表明,这些项目对总体不平等衡量指标的贡献各不相同,即其中两个项目分别对总体指标贡献了13%和5%。其次,为了说明“按亚组”方法,我们按就业状况对集中指数进行分解。这涉及将人群分为两组:目前就业的个人;以及目前未就业的个人。我们发现,这些组之间的不平等程度大约是每组内部不平等程度的五倍。这些方法为不平等的本质提供了见解,可用于为减少与收入相关的健康不平等的政策设计提供参考。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验